glenc
15-10-2010, 05:47 AM
The report measures the amount of natural resources needed to sustain each person's lifestyle, or ecological footprint, which is expressed in units called global hectares (gha).
For Australians, 6.8 gha per person is needed each year to sustain our lifestyles, thanks largely to our carbon emissions and grazing footprint.
This compares to 8 gha for those in the United States, 4.9 gha for United Kingdom residents and 2.2 gha for people living in China.
The nation with the largest ecological footprint is the United Arab Emirates at 10.7 gha per person.
[NZ is less than the UK]
http://news.smh.com.au/breaking-news-national/aussies-live-beyond-sustainability-wwf-20101014-16l39.html
On average, the footprint of high-income countries is five times bigger than that of low-income countries. And carbon now accounts for more than half the global ecological footprint.
http://www.wwf.org.uk/what_we_do/about_us/living_planet_report_2010/
For Australians, 6.8 gha per person is needed each year to sustain our lifestyles, thanks largely to our carbon emissions and grazing footprint.
This compares to 8 gha for those in the United States, 4.9 gha for United Kingdom residents and 2.2 gha for people living in China.
The nation with the largest ecological footprint is the United Arab Emirates at 10.7 gha per person.
[NZ is less than the UK]
http://news.smh.com.au/breaking-news-national/aussies-live-beyond-sustainability-wwf-20101014-16l39.html
On average, the footprint of high-income countries is five times bigger than that of low-income countries. And carbon now accounts for more than half the global ecological footprint.
http://www.wwf.org.uk/what_we_do/about_us/living_planet_report_2010/