bird
18-03-2010, 10:56 AM
Info here is probably of interest only to planetary imagers...
There is a thread on CN where Torsten Edelmann and Emil Kraaikamp tried replacing the ccd in their DMK21 camera with a new Sony Ex-View ccd, and saw a dramatic increase in sensitivity. The original thread is here:
http://www.cloudynights.com/ubbthreads/showflat.php/Cat/0/Number/3567648/page/2/view/collapsed/sb/5/o/all/fpart/1
and here's a followup thread with a very impressive animation of Mars using the new ccd:
http://www.cloudynights.com/ubbthreads/showflat.php/Cat/0/Number/3661003/page/0/view/collapsed/sb/5/o/all/fpart/1
And another overview page of this experiment:
http://www.astrokraai.nl/wiki/index.php?title=Installing_the_ICX6 18ALA-E_CCD_on_the_DMK21.
I've gone through the product sheets for the new icx618ala ccd, and compared it to the two most popular existing ccds - the icx098bl as used in the DMK21, and the icx424al as used in the Dragonfly2 (my camera), the Lumenera SkyNyx and LU075M cameras.
There are two obvious improvements that I can see - the spectral sensitivity of the icx618ala is much improved at the red/near-IR, in fact on Mars through an IR-pass 742nm filter this ccd has more than 2x the relative sensitivity of the others. The only downside is that the blue end is slightly less sensitive - 75% in the icx618ala as compared to 85% in the others.
But this is more than compensated once you look at the ccd sensitivity numbers :-) The raw sensitivities for what Sony term "Standard Imaging condition 1" are given as:
ICX089bl: 500mv
ICX424al: 880mv
ICX618ala: 1200mv
This doesn't tell the whole story, as the pixels are different sizes in the three ccd's, the icx098bl is 5.6um, icx424al is 7.4um, and the icx618ala is 5.6um. Once we compensate for the pixel size differences (ie imagine adjusting the focal length of the scope to give images the same size in all three ccd's) we get the following sensitivity in mV per square micron:
ICX098bl: 15.94 mV/u2
ICX424al: 16.07 mV/u2
ICX618ala: 38.26 mV/u2
Here's the payoff - the ICX618ala has more than 2x the sensitivity of the others, and that peak is in the orange (600nm) and retains 90% of that sensitivity up to 800nm.
For those of you still awake by now, this effectively means that I would get the same brightness increase as if I'd replaced my 14.5" mirror with a 22" mirror with my current camera. Not bad at all...
Once again, on Mars with an ir-742nm filter, we could expect to see something like 4x the image brightness due to both the spectral response and improved sensitivity.
A few cameras are coming onto the market right now with this ccd, I'll be receiving a Flea3 camera from Point Grey Research in the next month or so to test... their website for this camera is www.flea3.com. It has all the firewire niceness you could want :-)
cheers, Bird
There is a thread on CN where Torsten Edelmann and Emil Kraaikamp tried replacing the ccd in their DMK21 camera with a new Sony Ex-View ccd, and saw a dramatic increase in sensitivity. The original thread is here:
http://www.cloudynights.com/ubbthreads/showflat.php/Cat/0/Number/3567648/page/2/view/collapsed/sb/5/o/all/fpart/1
and here's a followup thread with a very impressive animation of Mars using the new ccd:
http://www.cloudynights.com/ubbthreads/showflat.php/Cat/0/Number/3661003/page/0/view/collapsed/sb/5/o/all/fpart/1
And another overview page of this experiment:
http://www.astrokraai.nl/wiki/index.php?title=Installing_the_ICX6 18ALA-E_CCD_on_the_DMK21.
I've gone through the product sheets for the new icx618ala ccd, and compared it to the two most popular existing ccds - the icx098bl as used in the DMK21, and the icx424al as used in the Dragonfly2 (my camera), the Lumenera SkyNyx and LU075M cameras.
There are two obvious improvements that I can see - the spectral sensitivity of the icx618ala is much improved at the red/near-IR, in fact on Mars through an IR-pass 742nm filter this ccd has more than 2x the relative sensitivity of the others. The only downside is that the blue end is slightly less sensitive - 75% in the icx618ala as compared to 85% in the others.
But this is more than compensated once you look at the ccd sensitivity numbers :-) The raw sensitivities for what Sony term "Standard Imaging condition 1" are given as:
ICX089bl: 500mv
ICX424al: 880mv
ICX618ala: 1200mv
This doesn't tell the whole story, as the pixels are different sizes in the three ccd's, the icx098bl is 5.6um, icx424al is 7.4um, and the icx618ala is 5.6um. Once we compensate for the pixel size differences (ie imagine adjusting the focal length of the scope to give images the same size in all three ccd's) we get the following sensitivity in mV per square micron:
ICX098bl: 15.94 mV/u2
ICX424al: 16.07 mV/u2
ICX618ala: 38.26 mV/u2
Here's the payoff - the ICX618ala has more than 2x the sensitivity of the others, and that peak is in the orange (600nm) and retains 90% of that sensitivity up to 800nm.
For those of you still awake by now, this effectively means that I would get the same brightness increase as if I'd replaced my 14.5" mirror with a 22" mirror with my current camera. Not bad at all...
Once again, on Mars with an ir-742nm filter, we could expect to see something like 4x the image brightness due to both the spectral response and improved sensitivity.
A few cameras are coming onto the market right now with this ccd, I'll be receiving a Flea3 camera from Point Grey Research in the next month or so to test... their website for this camera is www.flea3.com. It has all the firewire niceness you could want :-)
cheers, Bird