Another Rosette.

[batema]

Hi,

My very understanding wife agreed for me to go to an imaging session the night before we took off for holidays. Taken using W/O Flt 110 and unmod canon 400d at ISO 800. 12 x 10 minute lights with dark,flats and bias frames added. Temp on the night was 18 c so am quite happy with the result. Stacked using DSS and processed photoshop CS3.

Any tips greatly appreciated.

Mark :D

[Hagar]

This image has come up very nice. Noise controlled well colour is also very good. You might have a bit of missalignment of your camera as the top right stars are softer and a little elongated the rest aren't to bad.
More exposure is required with an unmodded camera.

Well done.

[multiweb]

Very nice and sharp. Good start but you'll need a lot more data. It's a faint one. :thumbsup:

[AlexN]

Good going Mark! Your guiding and focus look spot on.. :)

Keep on plugging mate! more data will see this one finished off nicely!

[batema]

Hi all. When people say more data do they mean more lots of the same exposure or more longer exposure added to the shots I have. Also I am going out tonight however at a moderately light polluted area so 10 minute shots will have the histogram right up. Should I bother.

Mark

[Geoff45]

Actually I think it's also some field curvature. Notice how the stars in all four corners are elongated away from the centre. However, the the left hand side does seem a shade worse than the right hand side, so there may be some misalignment as well. I have exactly the same problems with my ZS110, which has the same optics as the FLT 110.

This is a faint object, especially with an unmodded camera. However you have a good starting point, so if you can add more data, things will only get better.

[Geoff45]

Doesn't matter too much which way you go, but one 10 min exposure will have less read noise than two 5 min ones. The main thing is to go for longer TOTAL exposure.