PDA

View Full Version here: : 'Free' "Double Star Atlas" (Taki)


Enchilada
17-04-2009, 03:40 PM
Those here might be aware that there was recently issued a "NEW: Cambridge Double Star Atlas", which can be bought at some expense. This Atlas was drawn Will Tirion, the same person who did the various popular sky atlases currently used by amateurs. Needless to say there are alternatives to this on the Net, whose usefulness is likely as good but cost nothing to download.

A good introductory one is the "Atlas of Double Stars" by Toshimi Taki and Pete Wehner, which can be obtained from the link http://www.asahi-net.or.jp/~zs3t-tk/index.htm (Under . Astronomy>Tools of Observation>Atlas of Double Stars (updated on March 2, 2008)

This atlas lists double stars that have the combined magnitude if 7.0 or brighter, whose angular separations are between 0.5 and 200 arcsec, and secondary companions that are brighter than 11th magnitude.
The scale of the thirty-six charts are in A4 (or other formats too) was scale is 39mm/ degree. They can be downloaded in four. c. 1 Mb bits. (If I were to be slightly negative, there is a lack of overlap with the charts mainly around +50 and -50 degrees declination. Annoying, but at least no pair within the range is missing.

In all there are more than 2053 double stars here that will easily satisfy those new to double stars. Some 304 bright deep-sky objects are included - most easy targets for amateur 'scopes.

Also for download is a basic catalogue of all objects presented in chart order.

There are some general drawbacks, however, that I have noticed. For example, Gamma Crucis and Alpha Circinus are not listed as double stars - especially annoying as these doubles are popular among amateur astronomers. Indeed, I suspect the southern portion is a little neglected compared to the north.

Highly recommended for a newbee.

(A sample of the chart is given of the Pointers and the Southern Cross.)

Note: Also available is the Taki's Star Atlas, and an A3 "Taki's 8.5 Magnitude Star Atlas." You can also make your own or modify the atlas using Powerpoint and Excel. A bit technical, but useful if you have some specialist usage -- like images you have taken or some specialised selection of objects. (I haven't used it, but it does look fairly easy.)

Enchilada
17-04-2009, 03:58 PM
Here is a sample of the Atlas, which I forgot to attach.

Interested in opinions of this. :help:

Coen
17-04-2009, 05:29 PM
I used Taki's atlas and supporting tables quite a bit initially. Especially the accompanying tables - I printed the atlas, bound it and have it nearby.

Then I came across the Tri-Atlas http://www.uv.es/jrtorres/index.html and associated software CNebulaX from which I do my planning from. I still cross reference to Taki's though.

The Tri-Atlas Hybrid maps (the "M" series) is pretty good match for the stars & objects for my telescope arrangement except it is a little cluttered in the busy regions around Carina for example (too many labels). The new 3rd edition will be addressing these "problems". I have printed out the M series (a bit over 200 charts) onto double sided A3 and find that a great resource near the telescope, especially for star-hopping.

The CNebulaX programme (which was used to generate the charts) has a search ability and I use it compile an observing programme for a constellation. I print out the list and attempt to view compiling my observing notes of the objects I succeed with. Sometimes when cross referencing the chart whilst at the scope I'll try an object that was not on my original list and see what I get.

There is also the Washington Double Star database which comes with search criteria in an Access database - now you can compile your own list based on your own criteria for magnitude differences, constellations etc. http://www.usno.navy.mil/USNO/astrometry/optical-IR-prod. I can not find the exact link to the access database but I know I got it from somewhere.

Robh
17-04-2009, 06:48 PM
I use this link
http://heasarc.gsfc.nasa.gov/W3Browse/all/wds.html
then select Browse this table ... (top left of page).
Regards, Rob.

Enchilada
17-04-2009, 10:05 PM
Coen and RobH
Thanks for your comments. I do agree the Torres atlas is pretty good, but without being too critical, I do find the print and scale too small - making it very difficult to read. (Using it at the 'scope near impossible) Nonetheless, if I were to support one Taki's Double Star Atlas is the one that in presents information to new users. Of course, Torres atlas is great for the experience ones, Taki's perhaps for the less experience observers.

If you are searching for double stars the Navel Observatory site is usually sufficient. There are others. Another is http://www.virtualcolony.com/sac/star-search-form.html , where you can sort double stars by constellation. Another is
http://www.astroclubul.org/brasov/wdsfilter/wdsfilter.php

Cheers