Log in

View Full Version here: : M42 Core in HaRGB


Bassnut
11-02-2009, 06:59 PM
Hi Guys

Thought Id attempt this rare object in proper RGB :whistle:. Well, HaRGB, that gets more detail.

The core looks washed out, but thats the way it is, all the samples I could find were the same.

Although its very bright, the extended neb is quite dim.

M42 Orion Nebula Core (http://fredsastro.googlepages.com/M42HaRGBfinalsite.jpg/M42HaRGBfinalsite-full;init:.jpg)in HaRGB
HaRGB Ha 3nm 3hrs bin1; RGB 45mins each bin2
Ha 10min and 1min subs, RGB 5min and 30sec subs
Taken on a Meade 12" LX200R OTA, G11, ST10XME, at f6.7

AlexN
11-02-2009, 07:02 PM
Looks very nice Fred.. A lot more viewable than the SHO shot! :)

if you take a look at the hubble image of M42, the core looks much the same as that image of yours... Thats gotta mean something.


Alex.

Omaroo
11-02-2009, 08:25 PM
Plagiarism!!!!!! :lol:


Looks great Fred. That's a phenomenally-tight FOV. You don't see this perspective often, so I can only go on HST photography too, and there is definitely a comparison to be made. Nice! :thumbsup:

AlexN
11-02-2009, 08:41 PM
Chris, agreed, the view sure is tight in this image... about 10 arc min tighter at each edge than my attempt :D

Bassnut
11-02-2009, 09:27 PM
Gee, thanks Alex, Chris, im flattered on references to HST :D.

Guiding wasnt so tight (= far too much time in PS).

Actually, apart from star bloom, the 5min 3nm Ha subs were fine by themselves for both the core and neb, a supprise on hearing all the grief about the need for multiple exposure times for M42. Goes to show the value of 16bit Astrocams and narrow Ha :thumbsup:.

AlexN
11-02-2009, 09:31 PM
I found 8min Ha subs with my QHY8 only just burned the core... but the QHY8 is a lot less sensitive than an ST10, and 13nm is a far cry from 3nm :D

I had to touch up my stars in my close up too fred :) Turned out ok in both our cases.. :)

gregbradley
12-02-2009, 04:18 PM
Holy Cow that's awesome Fred.

Greg.

peeb61
12-02-2009, 04:49 PM
Fred,
Just beautiful mate!

Paul

Bassnut
12-02-2009, 04:59 PM
Thanks Alex, Greg and Paul

Alex, 8 mins is a long exposure ?? (despite sensitivity etc), If that burnt the core, did you take shorter exposures too ?.

I see a lot of burnt cores, I dont get it, short exposures are easier than long ones, I dont know why anyone who can do layer masks puts up with a burnt core, just keep doing shorter and shorter exposures until it doesnt (just for the core) :shrug:.

I must say, for M42, wide field is more attractive generally :P

AlexN
12-02-2009, 05:03 PM
Fred - Wash your mouth out with dettol after that comment! want a wider field? do a mosaic! :P :)

And yes, I took shorter subs to bring the core back.. a few @ 1 minute and a few @ 30sec... this tamed it down nicely...

spearo
12-02-2009, 07:13 PM
well done
great detail
frank

marc4darkskies
13-02-2009, 08:46 AM
Mmmmmm ... RGB!! I've just had the bandages taken off my eyes from the temporary blindness caused by your last, lets say, non-RGB version. ;):P But this one is sweet Fred - a very cool, detailed and easy-on-the-eyes image! :thumbsup::thumbsup:

Cheers, Marcus

Hagar
13-02-2009, 09:05 AM
Hi fred, This one is a bit more to my taste than your last although like you, I think M42 is a much better target for a wider field. Still the clarity of the shot makes it a real winner. Thanks for posting this comparison image.

RB
13-02-2009, 12:02 PM
Very nice indeed Fred, lovely and smooth with heaps of detail.

:thumbsup:

Garyh
14-02-2009, 08:27 AM
It`s M42 alright, but boy it`s a very nice one! the detail and contrast around the core is stunning!

Deeno
14-02-2009, 08:35 AM
Spectacular Fred,

M42 eh, running out of targets are we?

Bassnut
14-02-2009, 09:43 AM
Alex, yes yes of course, mozaic, thats what I ment :thumbsup:

Thanks Frank, glad you liked it :)

Cheers Marcus, that NB is starting to look not so clever now. Easy on the eyes, well, I had too, restor some credbility :P

Doug, thanks, yes, the core by its self is not so attractive, iether its pushed and too agressive, or a little washed out.

Thanks Gary,yep its M42, the only neb you can centre on in the finder scope :D.

Cheers Deeno, yes I ran out, couldnt avoid it anymore :whistle:

leon
14-02-2009, 10:45 AM
Wow, that is deep, nice going Fred, beautiful work.

Leon

Ric
14-02-2009, 09:50 PM
Wow what a fantastic image Fred. There is so much intricate detail hidden away in the core.

Jen
15-02-2009, 01:07 AM
:eyepop::eyepop: wow Fred you take some beautiful shots keep up the great work cheers :thumbsup:

CoolhandJo
15-02-2009, 11:27 AM
Good detail. Great skills To me this is where the 12" LX200 comes into its own at f6.7!

jase
15-02-2009, 08:42 PM
Shows signs of promise Fred. More appealing than your previous. You're losing your narrowband touch - surprise me next time with a nice SHO palette. Stars actually turned out well in this image. Always pleasing for a HaRGB blend. Well done.

Bassnut
15-02-2009, 09:15 PM
Thanks Leon, Ric, Jen :D:D ;), Dr Paul and Jase

Nice to see I didnt lose you altogether Leon :thumbsup:, thanks for looking again and your comments.

Jase, yes, Ill do the NB again, colours are not to flash, bit of a stuff up really :doh:.