PDA

View Full Version here: : Alnitak


TrevorW
22-01-2009, 08:18 PM
On a recent imaging session of the Horse head I was able to seperate Alnitak's companion star and thought it would be a good idea to submit some data

ALNITAK (Zeta Orionis). With brilliant Betelgeuse (http://www.astro.uiuc.edu/%7Ekaler/sow/betelgeuse.html) and Rigel (http://www.astro.uiuc.edu/%7Ekaler/sow/rigel.html) dominating great Orion (http://www.astro.uiuc.edu/%7Ekaler/sow/orion-p.html), we pay little heed to the individual stars of the Hunter's belt except as a group, the trio the Arabs called the "string of pearls." All second magnitude, Johannes Bayer seems to have named the stars Delta (http://www.astro.uiuc.edu/%7Ekaler/sow/mintaka.html), Epsilon (http://www.astro.uiuc.edu/%7Ekaler/sow/alnilam.html), and Zeta from right to left. The name of the left hand star, Alnitak (Zeta Orionis), stands in for the whole string, and comes from a phrase that means "the belt of al jauza," "al jauza" the Arabs female "central one." Separate Alnitak from the belt and it becomes a most remarkable star in its own right, the brightest class O star in the sky, a hot blue supergiant. Tucked right next to it is a companion, a blue class B hydrogen-fusing star about three seconds of arc away, the pair orbiting each other with a period estimated to be thousands of years long. The region around Alnitak is remarkable as well, containing several dusty clouds of interstellar gas, including the famed "Horsehead Nebula" to the south. Alnitak approaches first magnitude even though at a distance of 800 light years. To the eye (ignoring the companion), it is 10,000 times more luminous than the Sun. However, its 31,000 Kelvin surface radiates mostly in the ultraviolet where the eye cannot see, and when that it taken into account, Alnitak's luminosity climbs to 100,000 times solar. A planet like the Earth would have to be 300 times farther from Alnitak than Earth is from the Sun (http://www.astro.uiuc.edu/%7Ekaler/sow/sun.html) (8 times Pluto's distance) for life like ours to survive. Such brilliance can only come from a star of great mass, Alnitak's estimated to be about 20 times solar (its dimmer companion's about 14 times solar). Like all O stars, Alnitak is a source of X-rays that seem to come from a wind that blows from its surface at nearly 2000 kilometers per second, the X- rays produced when blobs of gas in the wind crash violently into one another. Massive stars use their fuel quickly and do not live very long. Alnitak is probably only about 6 million years old (as opposed to the Sun's 4.5 billion year age) and it has already begun to die, hydrogen fusion having ceased in its core. The star will eventually become a red supergiant somewhat like Betelgeuse and almost certainly will explode as a supernova, leaving its companion orbiting a hot, madly spinning neutron star.

renormalised
22-01-2009, 08:59 PM
Good report, Trevor.

Dennis
22-01-2009, 10:06 PM
Hi Trevor

By sheer coincidence, I managed to split Alnitak on 15th January and this leads me to believe that although you have produced a terrific image, I don’t think that you may have “split” Alnitak?

What put me onto it is that I had to use an x4 PowerMate on my 180mm F12 ‘scope, giving me an effective focal length of 8640mm! The separation is around 2.23 arcsecs.

Having a quick look at The Sky, I think a better candidate for your close companion is GSC4771:1207 which is around 58” away?

What do you reckon?

Cheers

Dennis

ngcles
23-01-2009, 12:22 AM
Hi Trevor & Dennis,

Dennis, the one you refer to (and have imaged) is mentioned in Hartung as the "companion" to Zeta Orionis (Alnitak) with the close seperation of 2.5". In my First Edition it is Object No 188 within the list, though Hartung does not cite any designation from a recognised catalogue for it. It is also recorded in my circa 1973 Nortons and has no designation there either. Is there one? Is there anybody out there with a latest edition Hartung that may contain additional info on a catalogue?

The one Trevor has imaged is the "companion" GSC4771:1207 -- which is also Σ774 (Struve 774) which is sep by 57.6" in PA 10 essentially unchanged in 100 years according to a cursory search (have I mentioned before how much I hate the SIMBAD interface).

A quick look at Dennis's image confirms it is indeed GSC4771:1207 (Σ774 B) with apparently the correct PA, magnitude and sep.

In the blurb Dennis posted, the "companion" there is refered to as being 3" distant (ie just like Hartung & Nortons) and is therefore quite likely gravitationally bound to Alnitak -- as noted. The one Trevor imaged is almost certainly not a gravitationally bound companion -- at a distance of 800-odd ly even assuming they are at the same distance, 58 arc-seconds equates to ... way too far away -- several light-years I'd think (couldn't be bothered to do the maths this time of night -- someone else can do it) !

So I reckon you are both right -- in the sense that both are recognised "companions" to Zeta Orionis. The one imaged by Trevor is not the one in the blurb -- but it is in a recognised catalogue. The one imaged by Dennis does not appear to be in a catalogue, but is likely physically bound to Alnitak.



Best,


Les D

renormalised
23-01-2009, 12:49 AM
If I entered the numbers into the formula (small angle formula) right, it's a separation of only 0.22ly....roughly 13900AU. Not conceivably out of Alnitak's gravitational maw, but it's most likely just a line of sight alignment. The true companion, at 3" is about 759AU distant.

Dennis
23-01-2009, 08:28 AM
Thanks for your investigation and report Les, so many stars, so much data; I was almost ready to throw my Mewlon out when I saw how easily Trevor had split Alnitak.:lol:

In the current Hartung (2nd Ed Marlin & Frew) I think this is listed as Object 215 (P310), a “brilliant white pair” and I think that this description refers to Trevor’s image rather than the closer companion in my image.

Cheers

Dennis

glenc
23-01-2009, 08:29 AM
Guide 8 is giving distance 2.23", PA 166 deg, mags 1.9+3.7.

TrevorW
23-01-2009, 10:52 AM
Well I'm glad I managed to stir up some interest even though I was wrong but this is what it's all about.

:shrug:

Dennis
23-01-2009, 10:57 AM
Hey Trevor

Notwithstaning that your image very nicely records this very interesting region; Les has so nicely described in his report that no one was wrong. Thanks for posting your image, it was a catalyst for discussing Alnitak and certainly has increased my knowledge of the system and its environs.:thumbsup:

Cheers

Dennis

Screwdriverone
23-01-2009, 04:36 PM
Nice one Trevor, impressive.

On a side note, I just realised that I see the word Alnitak and immediately in my head say AL TEE NAK - spelled Altinak?!?

Funny I have never noticed that before, thanks for posting this, its even FIXED up my pronunciation of the word. :)

Cheers

Chris