Log in

View Full Version here: : 22nd July Jupiter


Lester
22-07-2008, 11:21 PM
Hi all,

It was good to capture Jupiter again after 3 weeks of cloud and bad conditions. Tried out the new laptop, and it worked well after I selected the correct codec on avi number 6.

Jupiter was being constantly washed with waves of blurred seeing, so I would only rate the conditions at 4.5/10 .

Captured with 2x barlow only due to the low grade conditions.

I am pleased with how the final image turned out.

Screwdriverone
22-07-2008, 11:23 PM
Geez, you wouldnt know the conditions were low grade!

Awesome Lester, just awesome.

Chris

Lester
22-07-2008, 11:45 PM
Thanks Chris, yes I was surprised how it processed also.

alphajuno
23-07-2008, 12:47 AM
That is a very nice picture. I had mediocre seeing last night as well but mine isn't nearly as good!! You captured almost the exact same face that I did a couple of days earlier so it was interesting to compare the changes. Thanks.

iceman
23-07-2008, 04:56 AM
Nice image, Lester. Well done.

Dennis
23-07-2008, 07:05 AM
Hi Lester

Your Jupiter sure is a sight for sore eyes! The image scale and detail is astonishing Lester, you’re really making this rig sing along now. Really good work mate!

Cheers

Dennis

Lester
23-07-2008, 07:15 AM
Thanks Dave, Mike and Dennis for your comments, I appreciate it.

Garyh
23-07-2008, 11:10 AM
Very nice Jup! Lester

Alchemy
23-07-2008, 05:35 PM
ts atreat, lovely detail and no colour cast at the sides. might just inspire me to get out and have a crack at it.

Matty P
23-07-2008, 05:54 PM
Awesome result Lester, it is hard to believe that the seeing was below average. This image definitely does not show it.

Very well done. :thumbsup:

Lester
23-07-2008, 06:37 PM
Thanks Gary, Clive and Matt for your replies.

Yes the seeing conditions with this result at first puzzled me to. Out of 4,500 frames I got 650 at 90%, where as with the July 2nd avis I was getting over 2,000 frames stacked at 90%. So I guess what has saved the image here is the number of frames that I still had to use and the smaller image scale.