renormalised
13-06-2008, 09:45 AM
I was getting bored sitting around not being able to do any observing, as the sky up here has been woeful for ages, so I decided to give the GRAS a bit of a shot. See what it was like...so I signed up for the trial run using GRAS-013 and gave it a go. Took some pics of M20.
The GRAS-013 is a Tak Sky 90 (90mm) APO, FL of 416mm, F/4.6 scope. FoV was 135' x 169'. The camera was a SBIG ST-2000XMC, single shot colour rig. Exposure time of 600secs (10 minutes). Original photo was preprocessed before I received it (darks, etc). When I got the original off the press, so to speak, it looked like it was being imaged through fog and there was a lot of noise in the pic. Looked pretty sad. So I did what I could to improve it (given what I had to work with, being preprocessed)... performed colour balance and adjusted the curves (played around mostly with the midtones and shadows). The results look quite a bit better and even though I might be able to do some more on the image, I'm happy with what I've got:).
I've posted the original and the cleaned up pic to show you the difference and what quality of pics are coming from the straight downloads from the scope.
If anyone wants to play around with the pics (jase, give them a whirl), feel free to do so.
The GRAS-013 is a Tak Sky 90 (90mm) APO, FL of 416mm, F/4.6 scope. FoV was 135' x 169'. The camera was a SBIG ST-2000XMC, single shot colour rig. Exposure time of 600secs (10 minutes). Original photo was preprocessed before I received it (darks, etc). When I got the original off the press, so to speak, it looked like it was being imaged through fog and there was a lot of noise in the pic. Looked pretty sad. So I did what I could to improve it (given what I had to work with, being preprocessed)... performed colour balance and adjusted the curves (played around mostly with the midtones and shadows). The results look quite a bit better and even though I might be able to do some more on the image, I'm happy with what I've got:).
I've posted the original and the cleaned up pic to show you the difference and what quality of pics are coming from the straight downloads from the scope.
If anyone wants to play around with the pics (jase, give them a whirl), feel free to do so.