View Full Version here: : Comet Holmes? (I think)
camisha
20-01-2008, 07:35 AM
Hi there - I have a couple of images of what I now believe to be Comet Holmes that I saw at dawn on about 16 November 2007. The images were only taken with my phone as by the time I came inside to get a camera and put new batteries in it, the comet wasn't as visible.
I stumbled across your site trying to find out exactly what I saw that morning. I've now blown up the images and would like to know how to post them.
Ok - I've just seen the attach button so here goes.
Enjoy!
37266
37267
37269
37270
Karlsson
20-01-2008, 08:34 AM
Camisha -
Interesting pictures indeed - but it is very unlikely that we're looking at Comet 17P/Holmes :(. By the looks of it the photos were taken around 6:00 in an ESE direction, assuming that it was near Melbourne...
On 16 November Holmes set at around 2:45 in the North - and it never rose any higher than 2°. This would have made it a real stretch to see it so low over the horizon, given that it is now a a rather fuzzy faint object...
While there were some comets around that area at the time I reckon they were all too faint to be seen at sunrise.
A distant aircraft perhaps?
erick
20-01-2008, 08:37 AM
Hi camisha and welcome!
Can you describe exactly what you saw? Did the light across in the sky.
Also what was the time? It looks like about 15-20 minutes before dawn.
And you are looking almost East from Melbourne?
Probably not Comet Holmes, but rather a satellite - we can try to work out which one. Might even be an aeroplane reflecting the sunlight. Still, we can check out where the comet was at that time.
Eric :)
CoombellKid
20-01-2008, 08:38 AM
Well I can tell you one thing it isn't Holmes, as Holmes is in the north and
moving very slowly and has almost zero tail. Looks more like con-trails from
an aircraft. Or maybe space junk burning up on re-entry or even an Iridium flare
but I'm not convenced of the later either
regards,CS
erick
20-01-2008, 09:05 AM
Just checked, Venus would have been bright in the sky, but north of the sunrise. It also wouldn't have produced a streak of light. So something moving in the sky, either reflecting sunlight, or perhaps something burning up in re-entry.
I'm interested in why a mobile phone camera shows a streak. Would a mobile phone camera take a long exposure? I don't think so, and the focus of the clouds and trees does not suggest a long exposure hand-held photo. Hence it really is a streak in the sky - that suggests a burning trail rather than a moving object reflecting light?
Camisha, how quickly did you get the four photos? I see you did zoom in between them.
Outbackmanyep
21-01-2008, 07:01 PM
Looks interesting, it's possibly not a trailed planet Ie: Venus, definitely NOT a comet, could be a plane although it5 is moving fast, or could be a vapour trail, the angle of the sunlight has convinced me its a reflection of sunlight off vapour trails left by aircraft, they do look comet like as i have seen heaps from my location!
Camisha, how quickly did this move? Was it easily seen to be moving with naked eye?
[1ponders]
21-01-2008, 07:31 PM
Where was the international space station at that time?
vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.