PDA

View Full Version here: : Omega Centauri - Pentax *istDS DSLR


Dennis
11-06-2005, 08:41 PM
Hi

Here is my first effort at combining 18 x 30 sec images of NGC5139 using a Pentax *istDS Digital SLR at the prime focus of my Vixen 4 inch refractor. The 30 sec images were captured from my back yard in light polluted Brisbane and I am quite impressed with how the DSLR performed. The mount was just tracking with no autoguiding.

I also tried NGC5128 (Centaurus A) but only managed to squeeze off two images before clouds rolled in, so I cannot compare the performance of the Pentax on fuzzy stuff as opposed to in-your-face monster sized mega-bright globulars. The image is cropped about 1/8 of the original full frame.

Cheers

Dennis

[1ponders]
11-06-2005, 08:49 PM
Wow :eyepop: Dennis. Brilliant, literally :thumbsup:What did you use to combine the images and what ISO speed?

acropolite
11-06-2005, 09:01 PM
Nice shot Dennis, in addition to Paul's question were the images Raw or compressed?

Dennis
11-06-2005, 09:11 PM
Hi Paul

Thanks for the complements. The images were captured in RAW mode (a native Pentax mode) and then I converted them to 8 bit tif's with the proprietary Pentax Photo Lab software. I used ImagePlus, (see http://www.mlunsold.com/ ), to align and then combine the images, followed by a default DDP in ImagePlus.

The stacking and DDP really makes this image, when compared to any one of the original, unprocessed 30 sec exposures, which look quite dull and washed out in comparison.

The sensitivity was ISO1600, manual focus, 30 sec exposures with the Pentax taking automatic, in-camera dark frames for each exposure. I forgot to take flat fields, but I don't think I needed them in the end.

Cheers

Dennis

h0ughy
11-06-2005, 09:13 PM
Great camera, fantastic shot. what were your settings Dennis?

Dennis
11-06-2005, 09:21 PM
Hi Guys

Here is one of the 30 second, full frame, unprocessed images as a comparison. All I have done is convert it from RAW to tif to jpg at 50% quality and resampled it to 800x534.

Cheers

Dennis

[1ponders]
11-06-2005, 09:23 PM
What a difference

[1ponders]
11-06-2005, 09:28 PM
Dennis are you using the full version or the Demo version?

atalas
11-06-2005, 09:39 PM
Great shot Dennis!looking forward to seeing more.

Louie :2thumbs:

Dennis
11-06-2005, 10:05 PM
Hi Paul

I purchased the full version when it was Release 1.7 and now I think I am on 2.10. I've only dabbled with it so far, as historically I have used MIRA AP and Corel PhotoPaint for processing ccd images with my SBIG ST7E.

However, ImagePlus looks as if it has huge potential although it is heavily biased towards the Canon and Nikon DSLRs rather than the Pentax family.

Cheers

Dennis

[1ponders]
11-06-2005, 10:29 PM
Boy there are so many of programs out there, its hard to decide which ones to use, which ones are value for money and which ones are beginner programs, you know the ones with training wheels. :)

xelasnave
12-06-2005, 11:02 AM
Congratulations on that capture fantastic really.
Now if you had said after three years practice I have produced this that would be something but first go ..mate brillant.
I must say comparing the results pre processed gives me hope.. All my images look sortta like the unprocessed shot.. so I live for the day I can work the sofeware as an expert.
alex

Dennis
12-06-2005, 01:46 PM
Hi Alex

I've had over 3 years practice with my SBIG ST7E CCD camera. Although the ST7E is only B&W, what I have learned about image processing was very helpful in then using my Pentax DSLR. Apart from good polar alignment, good tracking and good focus, my best results have come from stacking lots of images and using the various image processing programs to display the image data to its best. The Omega Centauri image really jumped out of the screen after the stacking and DDP (Digital Data Processing) function in ImagePlus.

Keep on capturing and stacking Alex, the various images you have posted in this forum are great efforts and definitely results to be proud of.

Cheers

Dennis

iceman
12-06-2005, 02:15 PM
Awesome shot Dennis.. the CA is pretty heavy on the bright stars, but who notices them when looking at the core of the glob! Brilliant shot.

1/8 size! Would love to see the full res version and just scroll around.. would feel like you're within it!

Dennis
12-06-2005, 03:05 PM
Hi Mike

CA - bugger, I thought that was nebulosity!!!!! I just resampled down to 1200 x 800 followed by a 50% jpeg compression. File size = 94k. It's not as good as the full res version but looks nice "hanging in space".

Cheers

Dennis

PS - did you receive the Qld Astrofest 2003 article and 3 batches of photos?

Robby
12-06-2005, 03:37 PM
Stunning stuff Denis. I'm most impressed with you focus and tracking. You got it spot-on there. Keep it up.
Don't worrt about the CA.!! I never actually saw it until Mike pointed it out ;). Too busy starring into the heart of the glob.. :D
Cheers

Dennis
12-06-2005, 07:31 PM
Hey Robby

Thanks for the complements from across the pond in NZ. I had a peek at your website - just awesome; really enjoyed my tour of your great images, equipment and home made stuff.

Cheers

Dennis

Robby
12-06-2005, 08:22 PM
Thanks for your comments Dennis! I've still got a wee way to go, but getting there!
I need to update the equipment pages, as I've got a bit of new stuff. Thanks for the prompting.
Cheers

Striker
13-06-2005, 09:23 AM
Thats fantastic Dennis.....

I think all the DSLR & CCD members should get together in the near future at my place to share their skills......(I need to leech..lol)

Great Job Dennis...

Dam cant find a torrent for Imagesplus......grrrr

asimov
13-06-2005, 01:50 PM
Geez Dennis! Fantastic! Even that 1 30 sec image is better than mine! Not even game to post mine....I'll get laughed outa the forum!!

Striker
13-06-2005, 02:09 PM
I feel the same way.....and I havn't even started imaging....and I'm already scared to post my first image.

Maybe we need a forum topic header like "Noob astrophotography attempts"

Rules and Guidlines

1) Must be out of focus
2) Can not be centered
3) Must have a lot of noise
4) Preferably discolored
5) Discription must be spelt wrong or incorrect NGC/M number.


I must say hasn't the quality of images gone up dramaticly since 6 months ago.

God job to all.

h0ughy
13-06-2005, 02:21 PM
striker at least get it right, it is the Pentax *ist that makes the difference :D :rofl: :2thumbs: and then the canon and then the other factor, they have some skill!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :poke:

h0ughy
20-06-2005, 10:20 AM
dennis, don't forget to vote http://www.iceinspace.com.au/forum/showthread.php?t=2507 need all the help there , I am the only pentax listed :sad: