Log in

View Full Version here: : Taking Great CCD Images


Phil
30-09-2007, 08:36 PM
Taking Great CCD Images
By Philip Holmes
I’ve found over many years of capturing CCD images there is a big learning curve which makes capturing these beautiful images part of the fun that goes into a long night at the telescope and computer , a bit of sleep some processing and then waiting till night falls again so I can do it all again. Providing the weather OK. There is nothing like sitting watching the computer screen downloading that next image. I myself got into CCD imaging as a bad neck injury hindered my ability to scan the sky looking through the eyepiece at these lovely objects . The ability to take CCD images has really helped me with my neck injury . I feel the goal of taking these images for me is that after a nights imaging I have a beautiful image I can share with my friends and to share with people that do not have the equipment to do so. It’s funny showing someone a photo of the night sky and then saying “is that really up there“?.
I couldn’t believe that these photo where taken with a black and white CCD camera . How do we get a colour photo out of a B/W CCD camera. The answer is we take a number of exposure through different filters which may include RED,GREEN,BLUE or L,R,G,B . Now we are seeing narrowed band photos which let through specified wavelengths of light . These may include H/alpha,Sulfur11,Oxygen111 to name a few.
So what goes into capturing these photos with a CCD camera. Precise polar alignment , a good mount , good optics long guided exposures and image reduction. Is just a part of how to capture these photos
A TIPICAL NIGHT AT THE TELESCOPE
Well where do we start . I can’t stress enough about polar alignment . Its one of those things when your starting out where you say “that’s close enough that will do” but when you have just taken 30mins or longer of exposures you soon find out how good your alignment is. So why do we need to polar align? the answer to that question is field rotation , miss alignment of images, good tracking, and the ability to put the subject on the chip. How do we polar align ?I myself use the drift alignment method there is plenty of information on the Internet on how to do this. If you are lucky enough to have an observatory this only needs to be done once.

The subject I am going to image . How long should the exposure be. The key here is to pick one subject and spend the hole night on it or several nights if need be. The more exposure time through each filter you give your subject the less noise in the final image. Another part of collecting these images is collecting reduction images which includes darks, flats, and bias frames. As much as I hate taking dark frames they should become your best friend and you should take lots of then, why? because of noise. There are many sources of noise. Cooling the CCD helps combat noise. What is a dark frame? a dark frame is an exposure of the chip in total darkness which is the same time and temperature as your light frames. To do this we may put the lens cap back on the telescope or if the CCD has a shutter we then expose the CCD to darkness. The dark frame reads the CCD noise the same noise that is in your light frame. We then subtract the dark frame from the light frame giving us a much cleaner image. Flat frames are used to map the optical path of your equipment being used, these can be used to clean up optical problems such as vignetting, internal reflections and dust donuts. There are many ways of taking flats this may include dome flats, sky flats or a light box.
Once I have found a subject and my telescope is polar aligned I start the same way as I would for visual work. I align the telescope. Find my subject and let the CCD cool down. Once the CCD has cooled down I may take a couple of dark frames. Then I spend some time focusing both the guide camera and the imaging camera. Once I know I have good focus I then calibrate the guide camera pick a guide star in the field that I am imaging and start the guide camera guiding. Then I select the first of the filtered exposures and firer away. I repeat this process unit I have enough dater for my photo, this includes taking more of those dark frames . There are many programs that let you set up a hole nights worth of imaging, once set up properly you press start and walk away. I myself like to take each exposure then recheck the focus and so on. After all this is done and its about 2.30am in the morning I turn everything of and go in for a cuppa thinking about what I have just been imaging. A couple of hours sleep does wonders before you jump in and process all that dater you have collected. If all went well you should have a beautiful image you can be proud of. Processing this darter is a whole different chapter to CCD imaging. I find mags like this one is great for finding exposure times. Go to the photo gallery and look at the photos, see what the subject is, how long they exposed the CCD for and give it a go. The best way to learn is by your mistakes, which I have made a lot of, it’s part of the process of learning the ticks to imaging. I find Iceinspace a great web sight for lots of information on CCD imagining along with lots of other great stuff and its Australian owned. Also I have read Ron Wodaski book The new CCD Astronomer this is a great book and a must have if you would like to get into CCD imaging. At the end of the night you have some great images to share with other people and there is nothing like showing someone your photos and watching their face light up.
Thanks for reading.
Phil

leon
30-09-2007, 09:43 PM
Thanks Phil a very good read and great advice,I will have to take a leaf out of your book and not get to excited about a good night and image only one object per night.

I tend to try for to many and usually bugger up something, or a least don't get enough exposure time of any image.

Cheers Leon

Phil
30-09-2007, 10:23 PM
Thanks Leon for readying this and your nice reply.
Phil

mill
30-09-2007, 10:31 PM
Yes one subject per night or over a couple of nights is the best way to get a good if not excellent image.
Nice read Phil.

ballaratdragons
30-09-2007, 10:48 PM
Oops!

I image several objects each imaging night. Ah well, I'm having fun :thumbsup:

Astroman
01-10-2007, 08:22 AM
I am slowly learning to spend more time on one particular object, typically I am like most, I like to cram in as many images as I can in a short observing run. The truth be known, this is not easy and prefer to spend more time on one object than spending all night moving around, realigning, readjusting, reguiding, etc........

JohnG
01-10-2007, 09:23 AM
A very well written article, I must agree, concentrating on one or maybe two objects per night is the way to go. I learnt that a long time ago with film and carried it over to the DSLR. Your advice on polar alignment and preparation is spot on.

I am about to make the change to more serious CCD imaging by way of an ST4000 camera and looking forward to this new phase of my imaging.

Well done :thumbsup:

Cheers

Phil
01-10-2007, 09:40 AM
Thanks for reading this. John will look foward to seeing your photos. I no when i started imaging i to would take as many photos as i could in one night. But after time you learn to slow down and now i will spend a couple of nights on one image. Thanks to the other for reading this two.
Phil

EzyStyles
01-10-2007, 11:48 AM
Great write up Phil thanks. same as you ken, always can't help but to image a few objects all the time.

jase
01-10-2007, 12:16 PM
Good work Phil. Captured the basics, perhaps the tip of the iceberg.

Quality over quantity. Don't be afraid of long integration times requiring data collection over multiple nights. I'd prefer to produce one compelling image every three months, than a dismal effort every week.

jjjnettie
01-10-2007, 12:39 PM
I hope this excellent article will be archived for posterity.
That was really well written Phil. Thanks for taking the time to write it.

Phil
01-10-2007, 01:02 PM
Thankyou JJJ and Eric and Jase
Phil

DeanoNZL
01-10-2007, 01:37 PM
Well done Phil.
I could even understand all the words without "googling"
A great read.:thumbsup:

Dennis
01-10-2007, 03:06 PM
What a lovely read - straight from the heart of someone who is passionate about what they do. I liked it a lot. It inspired, as well as educated me.

Cheers

Dennis

Phil
01-10-2007, 06:15 PM
Thanks Dennis and DeanoNL for you nice reply.
Phil

netwolf
03-10-2007, 10:57 PM
Phil the more i have thought about this thread the more I have learned. Thank you. You are absolutely correct the study of the subject before imaging is key. Understanding the nature of the signal we are capturing is imperative. When imaging the Lunar Eclipse I finally understood something by playing around with the camera exposure settings. A short exposure gave lots of detail on the non-eclipsed section but almost nothing in the eclipsed section. Where as a longer exposure gave more detail on the eclipsed part and the non-eclipsed bit was over exposed. Further seeing Eric's recent Orion Post hammered in the idea that by combing these two using layers one can get a much better full image. Perhaps this is understood by many out there but for me this was something I had to do practically to understand. Eric's post of the image and explanation of his work combined with your work, have made me gain a new respect for this hobby and the imaging aspect of it. I had earlier written off imaging as not being important as visual observation. But I take that back now. There is a greater understanding to be gained in doing this. Signals, noise, filters it all makes sense now. What filter's are used and there specifications are not a random choice but a scientific one based on what we know of the subject.

Ken I also don't disagree with your method, experience also enlightens as much as reading about it. A place for theory and practical. The fun and joy of seeing results encourages us to learn more.


Regards
Fahim

Phil
04-10-2007, 07:47 AM
Thanks Fahim. After while you learn to slow down and get as much data as possible. Make for a better photo at the end of collecting all that data. Also focus is a big key to getting good photo to. Also a key to good focus is getting your FWHM down the lower you get this no: the better your focus. The difference between say 1.7 and 2 is a lot when it comes to focusing.
Phil

DJVege
04-10-2007, 10:35 AM
Great read, Phil. And great advice.

I keep learning heaps from you. :thumbsup:

Phil
04-10-2007, 06:26 PM
Thanks DJ hope u get your scope work out. You will have to move back up hear.
Phil