xelasnave
01-08-2007, 10:19 PM
Well I thought some long exposures stacked may be the go.
Using the 70/300 ($200 cheap lens as in the twin lens pak) piggy back unguided on an eq6 thru canon 300d and 800 iso.
I meant to do everything right with 300 seconds per frame:) well they came in all over the place:D 320 , 340 that sort of thing cause I was doing something else:whistle: and kept forgetting to close the shutter:eyepop: .. so you will forgive me adding a near 400 second dark frame..to the five frames at approximately 300 seconds...I did a flat field but lost it..not really but it would not stack last time so I left it out..it stacked so its here:thumbsup: .
All hail to deep sky stacker ..mind you I tried to get it to stack these and others about 2 weeks ago and it would not...
Took the best result I could manage from Deep Sky Stacker and put it in photo shop..did auto levels, and auto colour, brightness blurr shadows thing;) ..and downsized it to this...lost a bit but there you go:)
alex:) :) :)
Using the 70/300 ($200 cheap lens as in the twin lens pak) piggy back unguided on an eq6 thru canon 300d and 800 iso.
I meant to do everything right with 300 seconds per frame:) well they came in all over the place:D 320 , 340 that sort of thing cause I was doing something else:whistle: and kept forgetting to close the shutter:eyepop: .. so you will forgive me adding a near 400 second dark frame..to the five frames at approximately 300 seconds...I did a flat field but lost it..not really but it would not stack last time so I left it out..it stacked so its here:thumbsup: .
All hail to deep sky stacker ..mind you I tried to get it to stack these and others about 2 weeks ago and it would not...
Took the best result I could manage from Deep Sky Stacker and put it in photo shop..did auto levels, and auto colour, brightness blurr shadows thing;) ..and downsized it to this...lost a bit but there you go:)
alex:) :) :)