PDA

View Full Version here: : Nature :- A global timekeeping problem postponed by global warming


gary
29-03-2024, 08:46 PM
In astronomical calculations we have to account for leap seconds. Since 1972, the SI unit for the second is defined as the duration of 9,192,631,770 periods of the radiation corresponding to the transition between the two hyperfine levels of the ground state of the caesium-133 atom.

That's a mouthful, but this definition and chosen number of cycles is no accident. Oscillations of the caesium-133 atom are at the heart of how atomic clocks maintain time and the 9,192,631,770 oscillations was chosen to make atomic time, known as TAI, to be as close as possible to the historical second of observed solar time known as UT1.

The Earth's rotation speed is not constant and measurably changes very slightly over time mainly because of the slowing down of the Earth's rotation due to tidal friction with the Moon.

A body with the quirky sounding name of the Earth Rotation Service in Paris keeps track of the difference between atomic time (TAI) and solar time (UT1). They publish the time difference every few days, typically in the order of tens of milliseconds. The official world time keeping standard is UTC. It ticks at the frequency of atomic time but is adjusted when the need arises to stay within ±0.9 seconds of solar time, UT1. So now and then we insert leap seconds into the world's time keeping, literally a 61st second to a minute.

Now in a paper published in Nature on 27th March 2024, researchers have shown that after accounting for other phenomena, such as the changes in the Earth's molten core, that another factor in the accounting is due to climate change. The melting polar icecaps is causing the angular velocity of the Earth to decrease rapidly.

It's not about to change day to day life for anyone soon. But still pretty screwed up a notion that we burnt so much fossil fuels in the period starting with the Industrial Revolution that we managed to measurably change the Earth's rotational velocity.

Link to paper, "A global timekeeping problem postponed by global warming",
by Duncan Carr Agnew Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-024-07170-0.epdf?sharing_token=HWrN6jSxE4zs_A nRe2VCsdRgN0jAjWel9jnR3ZoTv0M8eI6W1 yLpWHEpE-RIkTCyYE2WIbRIkp2z3i1LfYhEU2V9y03mw 5cDhgbKRHSA4woU3Nth3iHd5lulcRYt0V49 ih0xDDP7UZN7QSbubxX1BEBqfKL4SRnRfg2 p0WsFQBEejeQTvd13bJ2urLz1eyTznxeVqe U1JlLpkbdUkE-a1-bnWzC_KbIdMLlWaOSLoZ0xb74-bIr-HGTa3Xgo7yZD1nHh1kj_SGsWrnODYN9bGGU exg7AtxTm1i1W7MJimyicS_FJP4RluoxdAs tSTxrbnMQo_qJjU-Kz3NND2jH-jA%3D%3D&tracking_referrer=www.abc.net.au&fbclid=IwAR3KZHuGuSdrWRsu6pwjx3FSZd 0mTuYvFvy5hwv5iSh0nGnjSwLIop7YUrA_a em_AU92SGROS8p0rQmgsEgV6YfBDcz7Wsa8 PIihip8KPCXyqeTlh2kNU-DJAlG0-Qpdsf9TujrtNquXCBtEF1oj-aJi

Leo.G
31-03-2024, 01:54 PM
If I can remember all of that I have a valid excuse for being late, LOL


If fossil fuel caused so much damage imagine what spontaneous igniting Tesla batteries are going to do for the environment?
No, I'm not disputing the facts but I think we need to advance beyond toxic lithium. The masses don't seem to understand the landfill and potential pollution problem with the current generation of batteries.
I'd like to see further development of ultra/super capacitors used in conjunction with batteries. At one time Honda, Toyota and the CSIRO (don't quote me on this my memory is crap) were working on carbon nano-fibre ulta capacitors in conjunction with batteries and getting good results
There's the new sodium based batteries apparently now available on the market but their capacity is nowhere near the density of lithium.


Then there's China and India, their pollutant output is HUGE, they just don't seem to care.

Crater101
31-03-2024, 04:25 PM
Quite a bit here was news to me. Sincere thanks for sharing! :thumbsup:

morls
26-05-2024, 04:10 PM
Thanks for this post Gary, very interesting.

Does this mean there is an enormous energy transition from angular momentum to some other form taking place? I'm simplistically imagining the kinetic/rotational energy reducing as momentum decreases.

I'm also wondering if the angular velocity of the earth would increase if earth went through a period of cooling, and the polar caps gained more mass?
Stephen

bgilbert
24-07-2024, 07:51 PM
Several hundred million years ago we had "snowball Earth". This situation existed for some millions of years. Prior to snow ball earth the planet was hotter than the present. After snow ball earth the earth was hotter than the present. It would appear that huge variations in climate existed before the industrial revolution started the CO2 increase that some people stress over so much.

Ryderscope
25-07-2024, 10:46 AM
For the avoidance of doubt Barry, are you saying that you don't believe that:

1. The increase in CO2 in the atmosphere since the start of the industrial revolution is man made.;
2. That the amount of atmospheric CO2 has increased at a rate far beyond that experienced before the industrial revolution in terms of volume and time scale.;
3. That this increase in CO2 has contributed significantly to the climate change and global warming that the world is currently experiencing? and
4. That this rapid change in climate is having a significant negative effect on the worlds eco systems.

Rodney