Log in

View Full Version here: : Test Results - IR Filter with Modified Toucam


ballaratdragons
06-06-2007, 12:56 AM
I have done the IR Filter modification mentioned HERE (http://www.iceinspace.com.au/forum/showthread.php?t=15302) and I have posted the results in this thread.

This image shows the comparison of 'The Keyhole Nebula in Carina' with and without the IR Filter. Both images are 3 minute exposures with identical settings.

The first thing to notice is that the Filter does not bloat the stars as much as without the filter, making them much crisper. Secondly, the background sky is darker. And thirdly, the Stars have colour! I prefer the IR Filtered version. :thumbsup:

ballaratdragons
06-06-2007, 01:00 AM
And here are the finished products of IR Filtering a Modified Toucam with all the glitz and glamour done!

1. Keyhole Nebula
2. Jewel Box

ballaratdragons
06-06-2007, 01:27 AM
Both images larger.

Sorry, couldn't help myself, as I am happy with them. :lol:

RB
06-06-2007, 02:25 AM
Wow, what a difference the filter makes !

Fantastic results once again Ken, just when we thought you reached the peak, you start to take things to a whole new different level.

:thumbsup:

avandonk
06-06-2007, 06:42 AM
The colour filters on most colour chips let through IR so that the camera can work in a pseudo B&W mode for IR illumination. These CCD chips have high sensitivity to IR. This will wash out colours and bloat stars. The use of a UV/IR blocking filter will really improve the image.
Having said that it looks like Ken has proved it for the ToUcam.

Good result Ken.

Bert

Ric
06-06-2007, 07:37 AM
An excellent comparison Ken, it really highlights the difference. Your two finished products are lovely, the Jewel Box is a ripper.

Cheers

[1ponders]
06-06-2007, 07:41 AM
I'd say you are on a winner there Ken. :thumbsup: A huge improvement.

erick
06-06-2007, 09:41 AM
Love the Jewel Box, Ken! :thumbsup:

ving
06-06-2007, 01:08 PM
premium images on a basement budget! excellent ken :D

i noticed however that while the amp glow has decreased the amound of visible nebula has too. if you take a longer exposure to regain that lost nebula do you get the bloating and amp glow back?

ballaratdragons
06-06-2007, 03:07 PM
Just for you Ric & Eric :thumbsup: :lol:

A super-duper close-up.

ballaratdragons
06-06-2007, 03:30 PM
Vingo, I can't explain why there is less amp glow, maybe coz it was colder, but the Neb is a bit fainter because I was imaging thru foggy haze last night with the filter. Transparency was miserable, whereas on the night I took the unfiltered image the sky was like glass.

I attempted 2 Galaxies (M83 & NGC4945) and they came out terrible, and the extra exposure time made the Amp glow show up just as much as without the filter. Even though the Galaxies were a failure, the stars around them still looked nice. Maybe the fog killed the Galaxies, dunno, but I'll try them again on a clear night.

erick
06-06-2007, 03:47 PM
Cool, thanks! Colour print, then this is going straight to the pool room! :lol:

ballaratdragons
06-06-2007, 03:49 PM
Tell him he's dreaming :lol:

Dr Nick
06-06-2007, 04:13 PM
Definetely much better with the filter! ;)

ving
06-06-2007, 05:01 PM
cool, thanks ken :)

shootin thru fog cant be easy!

Ric
06-06-2007, 07:39 PM
Ta Ken, a lovely example of the Jewel box. The spikes really set it off as does the framing.

Cheers mate

dugnsuz
07-06-2007, 08:36 PM
Very nice Ken

atalas
09-06-2007, 03:51 PM
Nice work...always IR Ken!