joshman
29-09-2023, 08:42 AM
This has always been one of the hardest targets for me to process. I think it was mostly due to the really intricate and busy nebulosity. The exceptionally strong OIII signal can also be quite overpowering when combining channels.
But I think with the skills and techniques I've learnt in Pixinsight, I've finally been able to produce an image that I'm reasonably happy with. This was mostly captured as a fill-in target at the end of the night, so I was limited with framing options. I might capture this target again later in the season with a better orientation and maybe a wider field as well.
See it real big on Astrobin here. (https://astrob.in/bbx35t/0/)
The capture details are on the Astrobin Page; for processing, a fairly standard workflow:
Stars:
LinearFit > ChannelCombination > SPCC > StarX > Stars Stretched in GHS
NB:
LinearFit > mild BlurX(non-stellar only) > StarX > NoiseX > GHS > ChannelCombination > NarrowbandNormalisation > CurvesTransformation
PixelMath to bring the stars back, BlurX to reduce star-size.
C&C welcome, I'm always looking to improve!
Thanks for looking and Clear Skies!
But I think with the skills and techniques I've learnt in Pixinsight, I've finally been able to produce an image that I'm reasonably happy with. This was mostly captured as a fill-in target at the end of the night, so I was limited with framing options. I might capture this target again later in the season with a better orientation and maybe a wider field as well.
See it real big on Astrobin here. (https://astrob.in/bbx35t/0/)
The capture details are on the Astrobin Page; for processing, a fairly standard workflow:
Stars:
LinearFit > ChannelCombination > SPCC > StarX > Stars Stretched in GHS
NB:
LinearFit > mild BlurX(non-stellar only) > StarX > NoiseX > GHS > ChannelCombination > NarrowbandNormalisation > CurvesTransformation
PixelMath to bring the stars back, BlurX to reduce star-size.
C&C welcome, I'm always looking to improve!
Thanks for looking and Clear Skies!