AstroViking
20-10-2022, 09:35 PM
Hi all,
Apologies for the delay, got caught up with stuff and wasn't able to sit down and smash out the processing like I wanted to.
The '183MC-Pro has been a bit more difficult to get my head around than I expected, so I'm not totally happy with what I've managed to produce. (Also adding an EAF to the mix didn't help, either.)
However, it's all a learning experience and things will only get better from here.
Looking at the two 47 Tuc / NGC104 images side-by-side, I can see that my processing efforts are... for lack of a better word... inconsistent from one session to the next.
NGC290 makes me think of an explosion in a confetti factory...
Cheers,
V
Image 1 - NGC290 + a good chunk of the SMC
Image 2 - 47 Tuc / NGC104 taken 2022-10-17
Image 3 - 47 Tuc / NGC104 taken 2022-10-19
I've misplaced what camera settings I used, but they were all taken with the ASI183MC-Pro (cooled to 0 degrees C), on the SW 72ED @ 357mm focal length.
Apologies for the delay, got caught up with stuff and wasn't able to sit down and smash out the processing like I wanted to.
The '183MC-Pro has been a bit more difficult to get my head around than I expected, so I'm not totally happy with what I've managed to produce. (Also adding an EAF to the mix didn't help, either.)
However, it's all a learning experience and things will only get better from here.
Looking at the two 47 Tuc / NGC104 images side-by-side, I can see that my processing efforts are... for lack of a better word... inconsistent from one session to the next.
NGC290 makes me think of an explosion in a confetti factory...
Cheers,
V
Image 1 - NGC290 + a good chunk of the SMC
Image 2 - 47 Tuc / NGC104 taken 2022-10-17
Image 3 - 47 Tuc / NGC104 taken 2022-10-19
I've misplaced what camera settings I used, but they were all taken with the ASI183MC-Pro (cooled to 0 degrees C), on the SW 72ED @ 357mm focal length.