Stonius
02-10-2022, 04:17 PM
I finally managed to get out last night - first clear night where I was actually free for a while.
I was determined to get some video of the planets, but it turned out to be one of 'those' nights where the astronomy Gods looked down and whispered 'not tonight, my child'.
Who is the god of astronomy anyway? I want to know who to pray to, or at least who to swear at!
Since I'd had to travel an hour to get there, I managed to use my ingenuity to make the best of a bad situation, using various redundant systems, but eventually called it at about 12 because the dew was just so bad and I was not having fun.
Anyway, I came here not to gripe (ok, to gripe a little bit - poor me!) but to ask about secondary dew heaters for larger telescopes as that was the real killer.
There seem to be two kinds - a little split circle that goes around the top of the secondary holder, and a collar that covers the 45 degree holder (which I lean towards). My secondary holder is 23cm around and about 73mm in diameter.
The thing I don't get is that heat rises, right? And all these methods sit above the secondary, so how do they help at all? Surely they must mess with the wavefront, at least a little? I also have a small fan set up to blow across the secondary as an experiment, but that was one of the things that didn't work last night (don't get me started). Would constant air-flow over the secondary be enough, or is it going to dew up regardless?
And how do you wrangle the cables? Doesn't it give you one spider vane that is fatter and a bit wobbly compared to the others? Does the diffraction have any effect on the image?
And lastly, power? These things can chew up almost an amp. I'm trying to keep things as light as possible everything attaches to the telescope and rotates with it, but at that rate I'll have to bring out the IHDSB (Incredibly Heavy Deep Cycle Battery) and climb down the ladder to drag it around it every time the telescope slews more than a few degrees in Az which doesn't sound like much fun. Who would ave thought an ultra-light would involve so much heavy lifting?
I guess now we have 2 weeks of clouds forecast in which to find a solution.
Thanks for any help.
I was determined to get some video of the planets, but it turned out to be one of 'those' nights where the astronomy Gods looked down and whispered 'not tonight, my child'.
Who is the god of astronomy anyway? I want to know who to pray to, or at least who to swear at!
Since I'd had to travel an hour to get there, I managed to use my ingenuity to make the best of a bad situation, using various redundant systems, but eventually called it at about 12 because the dew was just so bad and I was not having fun.
Anyway, I came here not to gripe (ok, to gripe a little bit - poor me!) but to ask about secondary dew heaters for larger telescopes as that was the real killer.
There seem to be two kinds - a little split circle that goes around the top of the secondary holder, and a collar that covers the 45 degree holder (which I lean towards). My secondary holder is 23cm around and about 73mm in diameter.
The thing I don't get is that heat rises, right? And all these methods sit above the secondary, so how do they help at all? Surely they must mess with the wavefront, at least a little? I also have a small fan set up to blow across the secondary as an experiment, but that was one of the things that didn't work last night (don't get me started). Would constant air-flow over the secondary be enough, or is it going to dew up regardless?
And how do you wrangle the cables? Doesn't it give you one spider vane that is fatter and a bit wobbly compared to the others? Does the diffraction have any effect on the image?
And lastly, power? These things can chew up almost an amp. I'm trying to keep things as light as possible everything attaches to the telescope and rotates with it, but at that rate I'll have to bring out the IHDSB (Incredibly Heavy Deep Cycle Battery) and climb down the ladder to drag it around it every time the telescope slews more than a few degrees in Az which doesn't sound like much fun. Who would ave thought an ultra-light would involve so much heavy lifting?
I guess now we have 2 weeks of clouds forecast in which to find a solution.
Thanks for any help.