tornado33
02-05-2005, 08:28 AM
Hi all
A bit of a learning curve getting used to using my off axis guider/focusser on my 10 inch F5.6 scope.
http://www.aeroquest-machining.com/page9.html
For the most part found guide stars ok, though they are a bit comatic due to they being off axis, like guiding on a short line rather than a dot. I used the 12mm eyepiece and 2.8x barlow. I can guide long with confidence now.
Camera is EOS300D
The Eta carina shot is a 1120sec (18 minute) and 770 sec (12 min)shot (ISO 200) stacked with registax. Ive never taken an 18 minute shot before with the 300d .No dark subtraction. I think it is my deepest ever pic of Eta Carina.
the Omega centauri shot is a 500 and a 570 sec shot stacked.
Guiding not 100% perfect in tonights shots, gotta get used to the way the scope "handles" now, the magnification of the guider is big, the tiniest adjustment sees movement of the guide star now.
ISO 200 gives much less noise, even with shots lasting over 10 minutes.
A bit of a learning curve getting used to using my off axis guider/focusser on my 10 inch F5.6 scope.
http://www.aeroquest-machining.com/page9.html
For the most part found guide stars ok, though they are a bit comatic due to they being off axis, like guiding on a short line rather than a dot. I used the 12mm eyepiece and 2.8x barlow. I can guide long with confidence now.
Camera is EOS300D
The Eta carina shot is a 1120sec (18 minute) and 770 sec (12 min)shot (ISO 200) stacked with registax. Ive never taken an 18 minute shot before with the 300d .No dark subtraction. I think it is my deepest ever pic of Eta Carina.
the Omega centauri shot is a 500 and a 570 sec shot stacked.
Guiding not 100% perfect in tonights shots, gotta get used to the way the scope "handles" now, the magnification of the guider is big, the tiniest adjustment sees movement of the guide star now.
ISO 200 gives much less noise, even with shots lasting over 10 minutes.