New X Ray Images of the Sun Yield Surprizes

[sheeny]

http://www.nature.com/news/2007/070319/full/070319-11.html

Some pretty cool video there to watch too.

Al.

[xelasnave]

Thanks for posting that Al I found it so very interesting:thumbsup: .

No one has asked my opinion on this...:eyepop:

“ Researchers have long been puzzled by the observation that the Sun's corona — the atmosphere of gas extending out from the Sun at a temperature of millions of degrees Celsius — is about a hundred times hotter than the Sun's surface. One possible explanation is that magnetic fields projecting from the Sun twist about in the turbulent environment until they eventually snap, releasing energy as heat. The data being returned by Hinode's X-Ray Telescope add weight to this theory...”

I worry about statements of how the data is somewhat predetermined in what it will prove... leaves little room for further thought:shrug: .

In fact thinking about it no one has asked my opinion on this or anything;) but that does not stop me thinking about these puzzles as I enjoy looking at them without the benefit of popular knowledge:) .

However I reckon what is going on is that the Sun's energy is meeting and reacting with dark energy (gravity rain) coming from all of space in much the same way as I see the reason why "sprites" appear in the upper atmosphere:) .
It can only remain a mystery if one of the ingredients is left out of the mix:shrug: .

Adding an external force not yet taken into account makes it work for me. Not taking into account a force that holds galaxies in place makes no sense to me..but that’s just me;) .

Dark energy (gravity rain or universal pressure whatever term suits one) is infinite in supply and the proposition of "an unmovable object (for this purpose the out flow of energy from the Sun) meeting an irresistible force (dark energy or gravity rain) comes to mind. The energy generated by such a proposition may better explain the mystery than the current ones...and of course it may not:) .

Everyone is happy to dismiss the propositions I propose without considering that maybe just maybe there is something in the way I see things, which although not supported by established science (dark energy is observable in the context of explaining how galaxies are hold together) can however explain many difficulties with ease (but no math):whistle: .

But the fact remains we have more energy in the Sun puzzle than current thinking says there should be found so is it unreasonable to seek an energy source external to those being taken into account:shrug: .

I know my persistence in presenting the importance and under estimation of dark energy (gravity rain) is tiresome but I must continue to present it in the hope just one other person may stop to consider the possible merit of my approach notwithstanding it comes from a layman.AND I doubt greatly that most will have bothered to read this far dismissing me with an aready set view of the world:shrug: .

I am sorry that this will annoy some people who think I am a crack pot:screwy: trying to understand matters way beyond my grasp and understand they must see my preoccupation with this matter as such:) .

I apologize but feel driven to try and solve the puzzles:D .

Look at the Sun movie and imagine an external force hurtling in at the speed of light (from all directions) in the mix colliding with the outflow of energy from the Sun and maybe you can glimpse if only for a moment what I see:shrug: .

Again sorry:sadeyes: and thanks for the link is gives me more morosophic ammunition for my gravity rain idea:lol: :lol: :lol: :thumbsup: .
Alex:) :) :)

[xelasnave]

Here is a way the energy may be explained:shrug: ..

"For the first time,we are now able to make out tiny granules of hot gas that rise and fall in the sun's magnetized atmosphere," said Dick Fisher, director of NASA's Heliophyics Division. "These images will open a new era of study on some of the sun's processes that effect Earth, astronauts, orbiting satellites and the solar system"
from
http://www.sciencedaily.com/upi/index.php?feed=Science&article=UPI-1-20070321-13553200-bc-us-nasa-hinode.xml
alex:) :) :)