Ryderscope
07-05-2020, 12:13 PM
This image was an experiment to see if I could capture reasonable data on a bright object during a busy moon period. I grabbed one hour of data on the night of 3-4 May and the remaining three hours of data on the night of 4-5 May. The moon was between 77% to 88% illuminated over the two nights. Because of the bright moon I limited to sub times to 30 seconds but took lots of them (120 x 30s per channel for LRGB).
I am pleased with the result and it is good to compare it to my previous Omega Centauri taken seven years ago. The equipment used then was a Skywatcher 4" refractor and a Canon 550D DSLR (un modified). I would have been doing manual focusing at the time as well.
Link to current image on Astrobin here. (https://astrob.in/1tevp9/0/)
Link to previous image here. (https://astrob.in/41896/C/)
As an aside it was interesting to observe the extra overhead that comes from taking multiple short exposures. With typical imaging runs of 5 to 10 minutes subs I allow an overhead of 20% to 25% extra data capture time over the actual image exposure time to allow for things like image download, re focusing etc. With this run is was close to a 100% overhead so for the fours hours of data I needed at least 8 hours of telescope time to capture the data.
I am pleased with the result and it is good to compare it to my previous Omega Centauri taken seven years ago. The equipment used then was a Skywatcher 4" refractor and a Canon 550D DSLR (un modified). I would have been doing manual focusing at the time as well.
Link to current image on Astrobin here. (https://astrob.in/1tevp9/0/)
Link to previous image here. (https://astrob.in/41896/C/)
As an aside it was interesting to observe the extra overhead that comes from taking multiple short exposures. With typical imaging runs of 5 to 10 minutes subs I allow an overhead of 20% to 25% extra data capture time over the actual image exposure time to allow for things like image download, re focusing etc. With this run is was close to a 100% overhead so for the fours hours of data I needed at least 8 hours of telescope time to capture the data.