DobDobDob
11-03-2007, 06:30 PM
Tonight was my first night observing with my new 6" refractor which I swapped for a car. To say I have a lot to learn is an understatement! My first impression was that the stars are very small, compared to what I have been seeing through my binoculars. I was sort of expecting that and by the end of the night I was over it, and the star sizes weren't an issue anymore.
I have since learned on another thread that the 40mm eyepiece will give a wider field of view and make things seem smaller, so tomorrow I am going to buy a couple of eyepieces, unless some forum member has a couple they want to sell :whistle: at a reduced price.
I am at this stage totally useless at pointing and finding objects, after 4 hours I was starting to get the hang of it. One thing is certain, it is better than the sore neck of binocular observing.
My first real observation was Jupiter and it looked awesome, however there is a funny aspect. When I first saw it, I saw one moon above the planet at 1.00 o'clock, and two moons under the planet at 7.30 pm, so I instinctively thought the fourth moon was hidden behind the planet. The planet itself looked full, bright, and crystal clear, a true spherical shape and despite my limiting eyepiece, it looked a reasonable size.
I went off and on to Jupiter 2 more times, the second time was similar to the first, but the third time (I was starting to become a pro at this :whistle: ), I started using the focuser and lo and behold, the single moon at the 1.00 o'clock position, split into 2 moons, no doubt about it, I was mistaken twice earlier but was so happy that the universe was back in it's correct order :P
I'm sure this would have been apparent in a lower powered eyepiece, time will tell. I wanted to see some of the better known objects, so I did a sort of go anywhere star hoping jaunt and went to Sirius, to see how big it appeared in the scope, it was by comparison with surrounding stars, as massive as you would expect.
I switched to Canopas to try and see the difference between these two giants and did observe a notable difference, however having said that Canopas is no tiny pushover in it's own right. Btw (Ving if you are reading, I could not see the double in Sirius, but will try again when I understand my equipment better).
I then visited Saturn and it was tiny in my FOV, I tried to estimate how many Saturn's could fit in my FOV from side to side and guessed about 25. Despite it being so small, it was totally sharp and crisp and for the first time the rings open up to me, beckoned me and memorized me. I was stuck on the shadow between the rings and the planet. I stared so intently my eyes watered and I had to look away occasionally. I think in that moment I caught some malady that has haunted men for eons.
Forever more I will be addicted to the beauty and magnificence of this jewel in the crown, to me, I have found my holy grail. Now my mission is to see it better and better and better, no matter what the cost. I assume that money is the primary difference between amazing and some other adjective that is infinitely higher than amazing ;)
I then had a go at the moon, I just had to, I knew it would be the end of my vision for awhile, but I did it anyway. It was crystal clear, I saw craters inside craters and shadows inside those. I saw it all, exactly the same as some of the photographs some forum members have been posting lately. I won't try to put into words how the moon appeared to me, other than to quickly say that it looked like a ball of iron that had taken many hits in its time. I thought to myself that if it rained (I know it can't), the moon would rust, that was my impression of this gun barrel grey ball of iron that was hanging precariously what seemed only inches above my head. The telescope was in harmony with the moon, it was an exquisite sight.
My final though about my first nights observing is how fast the objects move out of your field of view. The way I was setup, which will get better in time, the objects were gone in seconds.
I do have clock drives on both axis but I think I am going to get a proper goto system, does anyone have any suggestions which is the best one that will fit my 6 inch Synta Refractor on an EQ5 mount?
In summary, despite being an absolute lunatic, having zero ability, being outside all night without shoes, and having an unstructured session, I had a ball, it was the time of my life astronomically. I can only wonder at the treats in store for me as I gain experience and better equipment. Thanks for reading this, as I have written it, it has reinforced that I was destined to do this and my journey has well and truly begun. :thumbsup:
I have since learned on another thread that the 40mm eyepiece will give a wider field of view and make things seem smaller, so tomorrow I am going to buy a couple of eyepieces, unless some forum member has a couple they want to sell :whistle: at a reduced price.
I am at this stage totally useless at pointing and finding objects, after 4 hours I was starting to get the hang of it. One thing is certain, it is better than the sore neck of binocular observing.
My first real observation was Jupiter and it looked awesome, however there is a funny aspect. When I first saw it, I saw one moon above the planet at 1.00 o'clock, and two moons under the planet at 7.30 pm, so I instinctively thought the fourth moon was hidden behind the planet. The planet itself looked full, bright, and crystal clear, a true spherical shape and despite my limiting eyepiece, it looked a reasonable size.
I went off and on to Jupiter 2 more times, the second time was similar to the first, but the third time (I was starting to become a pro at this :whistle: ), I started using the focuser and lo and behold, the single moon at the 1.00 o'clock position, split into 2 moons, no doubt about it, I was mistaken twice earlier but was so happy that the universe was back in it's correct order :P
I'm sure this would have been apparent in a lower powered eyepiece, time will tell. I wanted to see some of the better known objects, so I did a sort of go anywhere star hoping jaunt and went to Sirius, to see how big it appeared in the scope, it was by comparison with surrounding stars, as massive as you would expect.
I switched to Canopas to try and see the difference between these two giants and did observe a notable difference, however having said that Canopas is no tiny pushover in it's own right. Btw (Ving if you are reading, I could not see the double in Sirius, but will try again when I understand my equipment better).
I then visited Saturn and it was tiny in my FOV, I tried to estimate how many Saturn's could fit in my FOV from side to side and guessed about 25. Despite it being so small, it was totally sharp and crisp and for the first time the rings open up to me, beckoned me and memorized me. I was stuck on the shadow between the rings and the planet. I stared so intently my eyes watered and I had to look away occasionally. I think in that moment I caught some malady that has haunted men for eons.
Forever more I will be addicted to the beauty and magnificence of this jewel in the crown, to me, I have found my holy grail. Now my mission is to see it better and better and better, no matter what the cost. I assume that money is the primary difference between amazing and some other adjective that is infinitely higher than amazing ;)
I then had a go at the moon, I just had to, I knew it would be the end of my vision for awhile, but I did it anyway. It was crystal clear, I saw craters inside craters and shadows inside those. I saw it all, exactly the same as some of the photographs some forum members have been posting lately. I won't try to put into words how the moon appeared to me, other than to quickly say that it looked like a ball of iron that had taken many hits in its time. I thought to myself that if it rained (I know it can't), the moon would rust, that was my impression of this gun barrel grey ball of iron that was hanging precariously what seemed only inches above my head. The telescope was in harmony with the moon, it was an exquisite sight.
My final though about my first nights observing is how fast the objects move out of your field of view. The way I was setup, which will get better in time, the objects were gone in seconds.
I do have clock drives on both axis but I think I am going to get a proper goto system, does anyone have any suggestions which is the best one that will fit my 6 inch Synta Refractor on an EQ5 mount?
In summary, despite being an absolute lunatic, having zero ability, being outside all night without shoes, and having an unstructured session, I had a ball, it was the time of my life astronomically. I can only wonder at the treats in store for me as I gain experience and better equipment. Thanks for reading this, as I have written it, it has reinforced that I was destined to do this and my journey has well and truly begun. :thumbsup: