Log in

View Full Version here: : Why not to image @ 26 degrees c


rogerg
03-02-2007, 02:33 PM
Noise, such wonderful noise....

(600s, 800asa, no darkframe)

leon
03-02-2007, 03:02 PM
That's noise alright, maybe a heap of shorter expo's at lower ISO would help, pretty colours though. :whistle:

Cheers leon :thumbsup:

avandonk
03-02-2007, 03:15 PM
Try the in camera noise reduction. I think you will be surprised.

Bert

rogerg
03-02-2007, 04:00 PM
yeah.. have done... I have dark frames to remove most of this too, but that's not the point...

RB
03-02-2007, 05:18 PM
600 seconds........:scared:

rogerg
03-02-2007, 05:30 PM
600? That's for wimps :lol: 2,400 seconds, now that's more fun :D

Seriously though - 600 is quite common for me, it's only vary occasionally it's worth me going to 40 minutes (2,400) with digital. And that's with the SBIG so noise isn't such an issue, I don't think I'd try 2,400 with the Canon :whistle:

I guess everyone has their own recipe for disaster ... err, I mean good images. :P

gbeal
03-02-2007, 07:46 PM
Yep, she's a common problem this time of year, I too am thinking I will wait until winter arrives.
Even with the ST8 I am having trouble getting the temp down.

tornado33
04-02-2007, 10:27 AM
Howdy
Hows this for a long exposure. A SINGLE 1 hour image of SNR RCW 103 thru the 7 Nm HA filter last year, a dark was also done and subtracted.
What amazes me is that DSLRs can operate at all at room temp. It goes to show if they could be cooled down to same temps as dedicated astro cameras theyed eat them for breakfast regarding dark noise.,

See Terry's results here
http://www.pbase.com/terrylovejoy/dark_noise__a_closer_look


Now imagine if the DSLR can be cooled, like this one
http://www.centralds.net/en/index.htm
The difference it makes is astounding.
Scott

Geoff45
12-02-2007, 01:33 PM
Hi Roger
It might be nice to see the same pic with dark noise removed.
I agree about the 10 mins. I've done 10 min in summer with no problems, so I'm looking forward to 20 min winter exposures.
Geoff