PDA

View Full Version here: : 30 Doradus


Peter Ward
11-12-2017, 09:31 AM
Have to say I'm quite pleased with this one so far.

The seeing was better than average and allowed me to resolve many features

....that are typically a mushy mess at 500mm...into some delightful filigree details.

Of course, I'll add to the data and do some colour.

A cropped field is shown at around 50% resolution. No de-con applied....great data doesn't need it :)


The link is here (http://www.atscope.com.au/BRO/gallery414.html)

Atmos
11-12-2017, 09:38 AM
That’s some pretty lovely detail Peter, resolution that I don’t quite get at 600mm :lol:
Going HaRGB or HOO?

JA
11-12-2017, 09:43 AM
Wonderful image Peter :thumbsup:

Best
JA

RickS
11-12-2017, 10:00 AM
Nice and crisp, Peter :thumbsup:

Peter Ward
11-12-2017, 10:10 AM
Thanks guys.



Ta. When the data first popped up on my monitor I thought: hummm haven't seen those turbulent bits before!

Will probably run with HaRGB, as OIII would require a carousel swap.

jenchris
11-12-2017, 10:29 AM
Eye popper.

Placidus
11-12-2017, 01:48 PM
Wonderful!

There is an interesting but tiny structure about 18 pixels across at coordinates (1060,950) (in a dark patch closely touching the spider's body), that looks like a slightly dark edged tilted perfect square. Unusual in space. Exactly the same translucent postage-stamp structure is present in our image. Never noticed it before.

Well done!

Best,
Mike

Star Catcher
11-12-2017, 04:22 PM
Looking great Peter!
Ted

Peter Ward
11-12-2017, 04:50 PM
Thanks Ted and Jen. Getting there I think.


Thanks Guys. You piqued my interest. This led me to the Hubble team's image of the same.

This led me to two realisations.
1) We are all hacks :lol:...the Hubble image is simply magnificent!
2) That celestial postage stamp is sort of, a low res Rorschach test. The
fish swimming towards me...or in this case postage stamp... goes away at higher resolution.;)

Stevec35
12-12-2017, 08:52 AM
Yes I think you are very justified in being pleased with that Peter. I love the highly detailed 3D appearance.

Cheers

Steve

multiweb
12-12-2017, 10:13 AM
Can't go wrong with an excellent tarantula. Good to see you've made the most of the good seeing of late. Top notch. :thumbsup::thumbsup::thumbsup:

Peter Ward
12-12-2017, 05:11 PM
Thank you gentlemen....it was partially clear last night, hence I used the opportunity to grab some more h-alpha.

Now with two hours worth of data I could apply just a smidge of sharpening, the results of which are at the same URL.

The forecast looks clear :D
:cool:

...hopefully long enough to bag some colour :thumbsup:

JA
12-12-2017, 05:30 PM
Hi Peter,

I visually remember the prior image was already excellent, and you've gone up a level and then some! Now for the colour. Good hunting.

Best
JA

Andy01
12-12-2017, 09:36 PM
Wow! Nice job- looking forward to the colour version :thumbsup:

alocky
12-12-2017, 11:35 PM
Beautifully done, Peter! I'm seriously impressed by the dynamic range you've captured in the centre and you can see the Radcliff 136 cluster clearly.
I'm intrigued by the two helical shapes just below the central part of the nebulosity. I saw them in my own Ha image, but they are much clearer in yours, and still look like two things have gone whizzing off and spinning...
cheers,
Andrew.

raymo
13-12-2017, 12:16 AM
Marvellous; it looks like you could jump in and fly around in there and take in the sights.
raymo

RobF
13-12-2017, 12:18 AM
Wonderful image, but also learned lots from the write up.
Didn't realise the relative size was so ginormous! :eyepop:

Joshua Bunn
13-12-2017, 07:40 AM
wonderful Peter, looks so 3d.

Josh

Peter Ward
13-12-2017, 04:20 PM
Thanks guys.
Colour is pretty much done, now on a separate post.

Regulus
13-12-2017, 06:45 PM
So good.
Lots of depth and detail.
Very nice Peter

Trev