Log in

View Full Version here: : Searching for Exo-Planets


sheeny
05-01-2007, 08:21 AM
I got this from this morning's physics at nature.

Al.

Special Report: Alien Earth

Abstract

With improved techniques, growing data sets and a new space mission, 2007 is the first year in which we might discover another planet like our own. Katharine Sanderson reports.


When marvelling at the stars on a clear night, it's hard to imagine that there are up to 400 billion of them in our Galaxy alone. Even harder to comprehend is how many planets may be orbiting these stars — a number that could run into trillions. Surely somewhere among them there must be a comfortable home for alien life, even if it's not advanced enough to be gazing back at us?
This is the question that exoplanet hunters are trying to answer. So far, they have spotted 209 planets beyond our Solar System. These tend to be gas giants in searingly hot orbits close to their parent stars — unlikely to be habitable. But researchers are edging closer to finding the one type of planet that we know can support life — a carbon copy of our own Earth. Thanks to improved techniques, mounting data and a new space mission, many believe that 2007 could be the year we find the first truly Earth-like planet. At the very least, we should have a much better idea of how common alien Earths may be.

The main obstacle for planet hunters is that planets outside the Solar System are obscured by the light from their stars, so our telescopes can't see them directly. Most researchers make use of the fact that when a planet orbits a star, its gravitational pull causes the star to wobble slightly. As the star wobbles, its speed as seen from Earth (its radial velocity, or RV) changes, and this shows as a change in the wavelength of the star's light. This can be used to estimate a lower limit for the planet's mass.
Unfortunately, RV tends to detect big planets that are close to their stars. Heavier planets cause more obvious wobbles. And close planets have shorter orbits, allowing researchers to observe several wobbles over a relatively short time.

So far, the method has found 197 exoplanets, the smallest of which is at least 7.4 times the mass of Earth. But improvements in accuracy are allowing researchers to spot ever smaller planets, and as more observations are made, it's possible to detect planets that are farther from their stars. Geoffrey Marcy of the University of California, Berkeley, is responsible for an impressive 121 of the planets found using RV, and says his team is set to announce several exciting discoveries in 2007. He adds that he expects RV to reveal several rocky planets this year, and that within the next few years we may know whether Earth-like planets are common or rare in the Universe.
Transit tricks

Another limitation of RV is that, on its own, it doesn't reveal what a planet is made of. But coupling its mass with an estimate of the planet's radius — which can be worked out as it passes in front of (transits) its star — gives the density, which indicates whether a planet is a diffuse gas giant or a smaller rock. The main problem with this is that to see a transiting planet you need to look at the correct angle at the correct time, and with most exoplanets found we haven't been so lucky. Transits are most common for large planets close to their stars, which again skews our knowledge away from planets like Earth.
In 2007, however, a European mission called COROT aims to improve the odds. Launched on 27 December, it will look specifically for transiting planets, which will then be followed up with RV measurements, either from Earth or from NASA's Spitzer Space Telescope.

After a couple of months of calibration, COROT will make observations for 150 days, then turn 180° and observe for another 150 days. To obtain reliable data, scientists need to watch three or four transits, so the craft's short observing period limits the search to planets close to their stars. This means COROT is unlikely to find a true Earth analogue. But it will tell us a lot about how common large, rocky planets are. "It's a necessary proof," says Malcolm Fridlund, project scientist on COROT. Fridlund is proud that Europe is leading the field rather than NASA. "We're taking the first step for once," he says.
"If rocky planets are common enough, COROT could find planets that are habitable," says David Charbonneau, an astronomer at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics in Cambridge, Massachusetts.
The first results from COROT should be in and analysed by mid-2007, with ground-based follow-up experiments done by the end of the year. "COROT will find oodles of short-period planets, both hot Jupiters and hot super-Earths," says Alan Boss, a theoretician at the Carnegie Institution in Washington DC. But some see COROT simply as a stats-gathering prelude to NASA's more ambitious Kepler mission, which is due to launch late in 2008 and will make observations over four years. "Kepler holds even greater promise to detect rocky planets around Sun-like stars," says Marcy.

For 2007, the best chance of spotting an Earth-like planet may come from another ground-based technique: gravitational microlensing. When two stars are closely aligned along our line of sight, the front star acts as a lens and magnifies light from the star behind, sometimes enough for an orbiting planet to be seen directly. Whereas RV is most sensitive to planets close to their stars, microlensing works best for distantly orbiting planets. Four planets have so far been detected in this way, including an icy 'super-Earth' (J.-P. Beaulieu et al.).
A star undergoes a microlensing event as seen from Earth only once every 100,000 years, so spotting them is "pretty hairy" says Andrew Gould of Ohio State University in Columbus. Gould coordinates a team of astronomers around the globe (the MicroFUN group) who monitor changes in the brightness of around 50 million stars. They post a list of possible microlensing sites online, and Gould alerts astronomers in the appropriate locations where and when to look.
The technique has bagged the lowest-mass planet so far, at 5.5 Earth masses. Gould predicts a one in ten chance of spotting an Earth-size planet in 2007 using microlensing, and reckons that in five years' time, he may be able to spot ten per year.
The COROT spacecraft will spend most of this year looking for rocky planets that might host life.


If an alien Earth is found, the big question of whether it could support life will require information about its atmosphere. And researchers are set to make big progress here too this year. It's possible to scan a distant planet's atmosphere by taking the spectrum of the light emitted by its star when the planet is completely hidden from view, and subtracting it from the combined spectrum when the planet is in front. The technique was used to investigate the spectra of Pluto and Charon in the 1980s, and in 2001, Charbonneau and his team used the Hubble Space Telescope to detect sodium in the atmosphere of a Jupiter-class planet orbiting the star HD 209458.
Last month, Jeremy Richardson of NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland, and his colleagues reported at the American Geophysical Union meeting in San Francisco that they have now used the Spitzer Space Telescope to make a more detailed study of the infrared spectrum of the same exoplanet. They measured the radiation emitted by the planet at various wavelengths, and are hopeful that they will be able to glean some information about the composition of its atmosphere. The team doesn't want to reveal details ahead of publication early this year. But co-author Sara Seager says that although these first spectral measurements are "pretty crummy", the work is crucial proof that the technique will "provide the first-ever spectrum of an exoplanet. This is a big breakthrough in exoplanet science."
This will be a big year for Spitzer, adds Charbonneau. He predicts that the telescope will study ten planets in detail in 2007, making temperature measurements and detecting gases such as methane and carbon monoxide.
For the future

Looking beyond 2007, "Kepler is the big one", says Charbonneau. Kepler's goal is to find an Earth-like planet. Like COROT, it will seek out transits, but will have more time to spot planets farther out from their stars.
After that, prospects for the field are less rosy. NASA recently cut funding for its proposed Space Interferometry Mission (SIM), which is now seriously delayed. SIM would make very precise measurements of stars' wobbles in two planes, which would give an actual mass, rather than the lower limits provided by RV.

The decision to cut funding has not gone down well, with Gould citing "stupidity" as one reason for the cut. Boss says the situation is "depressing" and a backward step for exoplanetary research. He warns that even a slight dip in funding could cause well-trained scientists to leave the field. Two other projects, the European Space Agency's Darwin and NASA's Terrestrial Planet Finder, would take the first images of Earth-like planets. But these are also receiving too little funding to proceed.

Should planet hunters be allocated scarce funds ahead of other projects? Scott Gaudi, who works with Gould, argues that the search for other worlds is a societal imperative: the question of whether other Earths exist is one that humans have always asked, he says. Despite the funding problems, he remains upbeat: "There is a very good chance that in our lifetime we will answer the age-old question: is there life out there?"

glenc
17-06-2010, 06:58 AM
Momentous haul of new planets not without controversy
June 17, 2010
IN ONLY its first 43 days of operation, NASA's Kepler orbiting telescope has identified 706 potential planets circling other stars, the agency said.
Although some are likely to be false positives that will be weeded out by further observation, the announcement on Tuesday could double the known number of so-called extrasolar planets, a figure that now stands at 461.
http://www.smh.com.au/world/science/momentous-haul-of-new-planets-not-without-controversy-20100616-ygk7.html

Nortilus
17-06-2010, 08:19 AM
At this point in time, does it really matter if we find exoplanets or not. Maybe only for our offspring's offspring's great grandchildren would any of this information be useful as none of us are going to be able to goto any of these planets. Yes, it might be nice to know they are out there and gives us some insight into how the universe formed. But other than that, they are just unreachable goals for at least 5 to 10 generations, even more.

bojan
17-06-2010, 08:34 AM
It does matter, a lot...

If for nothing else, then because then we will KNOW.. it will not be just a theory or speculation.

And just consider all philosophical implications of that knowledge... wow.

allan gould
17-06-2010, 08:39 AM
Agree wholeheartedly with you Bojan. Knowledge is the prize rather than ignorance and speculation. Certainty in one area then allows our imaginations to go to the next level.

Nortilus
17-06-2010, 09:50 AM
yes, knowledge is the supreme winner in all discoveries, but most of the data about these exoplanets will be just, oh, theres a rock, oxygen nitrogen water, oh that place looks nice. Lets send a probe there. 3 million years later, cats evolve into vain humanoids, anally clean androids, hologram companions...will humans even be around then to benefit from that knowledge of a compatible planet. and what if there is nothing there, or we were too late and the star has gone supernova. It is great to know that there are other worlds out there and that people are trying to discover "new earths" but in the current technolgical timeframe, that is about all the it is going to be discovery, unless there is serious work going on to develop a craft that could make the journey in at least a human lifespan, then it would be true and physical discovery, not just photons and 1s and 0s.

bojan
17-06-2010, 10:07 AM
Well, you can't look at all that through the prism of "benefit" or, let me be blunt here - money.

Science and knowledge is not about money and not about immediate benefit (business). There are countless examples of "useless" knowledge
that suddenly became very useful..

In case of knowledge about existence of exoplanets and whether they support life (intelligent life, even), the immediate benefits will be mainly philosophical, but I am sure there will be also significant impact on our everyday life - because this knowledge may change the way we think about everyday things (religion, for example - this aspect of human activity is pretty useless from practical-business point of view (regardless of which side of it we are) but it influences our lives very much, whether we want to admit it or not..

Nortilus
17-06-2010, 11:11 AM
Yeah, I do thinks its great that exoplanets are been found. But the effort to find more and more and more of them is pointless at this moment, until we can go there, the are just a number in a catalog. They are still an amazing discovery. I think astronomy and science in general is no longer about the where are we from? why are we here? but more how the hell do we get off this rock? where are we going?
As for philosophical answers, meh. Give me hard evidence then we'll talk turkey. ( God created earth is 6 days and on the 7th day rested. Well when did he make those other planets and lifeforms hey. The week before last?)

bojan
17-06-2010, 11:18 AM
I agree in general, but I do not agree the effort is pointless. .



Personally, since I am not religious at all, I can't discuss this ;)
However, I do believe the positive knowledge of exoplanets and alien life existence WILL change some other people's minds.. to some extent at least.
And that change in attitude may change our lives as well.. a bit.

Nortilus
17-06-2010, 11:32 AM
I would certainly like to hope they can cure death so that I could live to see where we are headed and where we end up as a species. Maybe there is a nice little planet orbiting another nice little yellow star, with nice beaches and fruity drinks in coconuts (Or whatever palm type nut thing has evolved there.) cause thats where i'll be headed, just keep 2 things off it and it'll be paradise, money and religion.