Log in

View Full Version here: : eskimo, crab, and a puppis planetary


Kal
27-12-2006, 08:24 PM
Hi all,

I imaged these 3 objects last night while out testing a few things. Tested my new (second hand) 15mm Panoptic, which is now my favourite eyepiece :thumbsup: Tried autoguiding with my ETX90/LPI combo, which will go down as a failure, as the LPI doesn't seem to be sensitive enough to pick up enough stars :( . Tested a tour I wrote and uploaded to my LX200, which was a success :D

I tried some new software out for processing these pics as well. Because I was using some 30 second exposures and staying on the target for 15+ minutes, I was getting quite a bit of field rotation, so registax gave me circular warp fields when I stacked them. I downloaded and tried out DeepSkyStacker (http://deepskystacker.free.fr/english/index.html) and used it to stack all of these images. It is a wonderful freeware program that does pretty much everything for you. A bit slow to process, but you don't even need to pick stars to lock onto for stacking, it automatically processes everything. Apart from stacking in this program, the only post processing was a levels adjustment in photoshop and a magic want for a dust mote (I really should take flats!) :whistle:

M1 - Crab nebula 21x30 seconds

NGC 2392 - Eskimo nebula 17x30 seconds

NGC 2440 - 26x15 seconds - I didn't even notice the faint "butterfly" shaped nebulosity until I was in the digital darkroom, I only saw/noticed the part that I have now oversaturated!!!

Dennis
27-12-2006, 09:09 PM
Nice trio of images Kal - well done.

Cheers

Dennis

ving
27-12-2006, 09:39 PM
great stuff kal!
congrats mate :)

tornado33
27-12-2006, 10:31 PM
Very nice, love the little planetary
Scott

atalas
28-12-2006, 08:59 AM
Nice work Kal.

rogerg
28-12-2006, 09:22 AM
It's amazing what you can get in 30 and 15 second exposures isn't it. It looks to me like you could get more out of these just with processing. Perhaps curves to bring the mid notes up without burning out more of the cores.

Roger.

Kal
28-12-2006, 10:15 AM
Thanks for the comments Dennis, David, Scott, Louie, & Roger.

With regards to the curves, DeepSkyStacker has an option for HDR (High Dynamic Range?) stacking, and I used that. It seemed to bring out the fainter detail alot more without burning out the bright areas as much. One thing that it did though was it seemed to make adjusting the curves in photoshop more difficult, so I just used the simpler level adjustment.

Cheers

astroron
28-12-2006, 12:05 PM
:hi: Andrew, some good shots there, your Crab Neb shot is very interesting, it MAYbe a good idea to get yourself a comparison professional image with the crab pulsar highlighted as I think you may have it on your image:eyepop: note I said maybe, I have compared your image to one on APOD and the bright stars near the centre of your picture and the Pulsar and they seem to match. :thumbsup:

Kal
28-12-2006, 12:45 PM
Hmmm, I never even looked for the pulsar in my shot, thanks for pointing it out! I take it that the pulsar is where I have marked this attached image? I have rotated it to match the view of the APOD photo (http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap020920.html)


:party2:

astroron
28-12-2006, 01:49 PM
Andrew yes, I tried to copy a pic with a better image of the pulsars position but couldn't.
I am on an observers site from the USA and they have seen the pulsar visually with a 16" scope.:astron:

Ric
29-12-2006, 11:10 AM
Hi Kal, they are great images that you have captured. I really like the crab, it has a lot of detail.

great stuff