View Full Version here: : A very short NGC 1808
codemonkey
26-02-2017, 01:25 PM
I should really start doing longer integrations again, but between equipment issues, getting clouded out on supposedly clear nights and my impatience, it's a struggle.
This is NGC 1808, only 2.4hrs of data, more than half of which was RGB (the remainder being L). I have a larger FOV which includes NGC 1792 but it doesn't really do justice to NGC 1808.
A larger version is available on Astrobin (http://www.astrobin.com/285117).
Atmos
26-02-2017, 02:00 PM
For what is a short integration, it's still really nice Lee :)
Placidus
26-02-2017, 02:00 PM
Hi, Lee,
The link to the big one isn't working, but from what we can see of the thumbnail, it is a jewel. An iridescent opal perhaps.
Eagerly awaiting the big image.
RickS
26-02-2017, 02:11 PM
Very nice, Lee! Would be good to go deeper and bring out more of the faint halo.
Here's a working Astrobin link: http://www.astrobin.com/285117/?nc=user
strongmanmike
26-02-2017, 02:20 PM
Cool galaxy and looking very colourful Lee, I like it. Those dust spikes rising out of the core region, a little reminiscent of M87, are what make this galaxy intriguing :)
Mike
codemonkey
26-02-2017, 02:59 PM
Thanks Colin :-)
Thanks Mike :-) I've corrected the link now, sorry about that. It definitely looks better in the smaller version so I wouldn't be too eager ;-)
Thanks Rick! Would definitely be good to go deeper, might help clean up some of that dust as well. I may yet add more data, see how I go.
Cheers Mike.. I did go fairly heavy with the colour; I was inspired by Warren Keller's very vibrant rendition of this. The dust rising out of the core is very cool indeed.
I've attached a larger FOV which includes 1792, which is believed to be interacting with 1808.
strongmanmike
26-02-2017, 03:06 PM
Hey, I like vibrant colour Lee, that wasnt a critisism :thumbsup:
Mike
Placidus
26-02-2017, 04:10 PM
The high-res still looks lovely. Beautiful colours, and surprisingly deep halo.
codemonkey
26-02-2017, 06:01 PM
All good Mike, no offense taken or anything--I *did* push the colour too hard for the data though, had to do some colour noise fiddling after I was done pushing that vibrance/saturation, so I think some criticism would be fair. I'm always happy to receive criticism on my stuff anyway, helps me get better :-)
Thanks mate - it's pretty noisy still, nothing more data and a 16" scope wouldn't fix though ;-)
Shiraz
28-02-2017, 09:29 PM
naah, your scope is just fine. if you can get that sort of depth and rich colour from 2.4 hours, you are doing very well.
codemonkey
02-03-2017, 07:39 AM
Cheers Ray :-) Have to say I am pretty happy with the Esprit.
Camelopardalis
02-03-2017, 10:45 AM
Nicely processed Lee :thumbsup: looks like a winner to me :D
Flugel88
02-03-2017, 01:21 PM
Very nice Lee i like the vibrancy of the galaxy and the well balanced dark background lots of little distant fuzzies in there too.
codemonkey
03-03-2017, 07:14 PM
Thanks Dunk :-)
Thanks Michael :-) I think the background's a bit dark in retrospect, but eh, nothing's ever perfect.
vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.