Log in

View Full Version here: : Sharpless 2-240 in HaRGB


RickS
21-02-2017, 09:38 PM
SH2-240 is a very large (approx 3x3 degrees) and dim supernova remnant on the Taurus/Auriga border.

We captured 63 hours of Ha data on this object back in late 2014/early 2015 at SRO (California) as a 3x3 mosaic with a FSQ106ED and QSI683 camera (2x2 binning). Unfortunately, we were too late to capture enough RGB to make a full colour image so I have been sitting on the data for a while. Then, in late 2016/early 2017 we captured 19 hours of Ha/R/G/B with a Rokinon 135mm f/2 lens at DSW (New Mexico) which included the original field of view. This is my first attempt to combine the data using the Rokinon wide field as a base. My next project is to make a high res version based on the SRO data with the DSW star colours.

DSW data capture details...

Scope: Rokinon 135mm f/2
Mount: Paramount ME
Camera: QSI583
Filters: Astrodon E-series Gen II LRGB, 5nm Ha
Image scale: 8.6 arcsec/pixel (drizzle to 4.3 arcsec/pixel)
Exposures: 24x300s R, 21x300s G, 27x300s B, 78x600s H (19 hours)

SRO data capture details...

Scope: FSQ-106ED
Mount: Paramount ME
Camera: QSI683
Filters: Astrodon 5nm Ha
Guiding: QSI OAG + Lodestar
Image scale: 4.19 arcsec/pixel
Exposures (3x3 mosaic):
A1: 16x1800s Ha
A2: 16x1800s Ha
A3: 13x1800s Ha
A4: 15x1800s Ha
A5: 07x1800s Ha
A6: 10x1800s Ha
A7: 19x1800s Ha
A8: 19x1800s Ha
A9: 11x1800s Ha

All image processing done in PixInsight. I'm still not sure if the result is just too red ;) I'm having some colour management issues that are proving difficult to diagnose.

Higher res version at Astrobin: http://www.astrobin.com/full/284525/0/

Thanks for looking and for any constructive comments.

Cheers,
Rick.

h0ughy
21-02-2017, 10:01 PM
:2thumbs: :2thumbs::bowdown: :bowdown::jawdrop::stargaze:

alpal
21-02-2017, 10:06 PM
That's nice Rick,
I wonder why there is no step in the red channel on the histogram?
The Green & Blue look normal.

ie.
the Red starts at a level of 52
The Green & Blue start at 0 as they should & slowly climb upwards.
How did you stretch the data?

cheers
Allan

Placidus
21-02-2017, 10:07 PM
That is magnificent. Wonderful.

Atmos
21-02-2017, 10:20 PM
Very nice Rick! One object that has always fascinated me... It's HUGE!

RickS
21-02-2017, 10:21 PM
Thanks, Dave :D



Not sure where that came from, Allan. It ended up being quite a complex process and a lot of tweaking happened. I suspect it was the NB/RGB combination but I'll step through the history and find out.



Thank you, M&T!

RickS
21-02-2017, 10:22 PM
Thanks, Colin. It certainly is a monster! About the same size as the Veil but much dimmer.

strongmanmike
21-02-2017, 11:16 PM
Great piece of work Rick and a lot of it by the sounds of it :thumbsup: It's a magnificent object. Nice use of different data sets and mosaicing, a great view and I think this object looks good in red.

I can't wait to have my FSQ...waiting, waiting...

I think I have seen this nebula on television (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UerBCXHKJ5s) before too?

MIke

glend
21-02-2017, 11:39 PM
Just great Rick. I admire your perservance in building over years. Great dedication. Your storage capacity must be significant to support retention of all that (and other) data.

gregbradley
21-02-2017, 11:56 PM
That's a stunner Rick. Gorgeous.

Greg.

willik
22-02-2017, 01:44 AM
That is a top shot a beut image Rick

Andy01
22-02-2017, 10:06 AM
Well done Rick!

Valiant and mighty data gathering and processing effort there Rick, big ups for patience & persistance. :thumbsup:

Stunning object and high on my bucketlist to try to image one day.

I wonder though, when comparing it to other images of this on Astrobin, if it's appearing to lose detail because it's oversaturated & lacking contrast?

Just my 2c worth but I'm thinking (can't believe I'm saying this) a bit of tweaking would yield an even better result. :scared3:

Disclaimer: Your image looks dramatically different when downloaded & viewed on my calibrated Hi Res monitor in Photoshop -which confirms my suspicions about Astrobin rendering images correctly.

Camelopardalis
22-02-2017, 10:09 AM
Outstanding Rick :thumbsup: the detail in the full-res version is (almost) unbelievable. Love all the faint faint nebulosity around the sides...must be really faint given the exposure time :eyepop:

RickS
22-02-2017, 10:43 AM
Thanks, Mike! Very topical video #LastnightinSweden :lol:



Thanks, Glen. I keep all the lights and master calibration frames. It does take up a bit of space but you never know when they'll come in handy.



Ta, Greg!



Thanks, Martin.



Thanks, Andy. Yes, there is definitely something not right with Astrobin rendering. It used to strip ICC profiles but that's been fixed for a while. The problem could be browser related too. Colour management on the web is a bit of a crap shoot.



Thanks, Dunk. Oh, it's faint all right ;)

ozstronomer
22-02-2017, 05:50 PM
Beautiful image Rick, great result. :thumbsup:

Geoff

Spookyer
22-02-2017, 07:29 PM
Rick that is quite and epic effort, well done.

Brett

RickS
22-02-2017, 07:47 PM
Thanks, Geoff!



Thanks, Brett. Not quite my longest integration time, but extra difficulty points for the 135mm/530mm focal length disparity :)

batema
22-02-2017, 08:13 PM
Absolutely stunning Rick. Beautiful.

Mark

RickS
22-02-2017, 08:28 PM
Allan: the red histogram is normal until I combine the luminance with the colour data and then the bottom of the red histogram kicks up a little. The area affected is just some speckles of background at the top left edge. Fixing the data makes no visible difference so I'm not going to worry about it :)



Thanks, Mark.

alpal
23-02-2017, 12:08 AM
Fair enough Rick,
It just looked strange on the histogram.
Normally on pictures you always leave a bit of room at the bottom end.
That also helps when converting to LAB mode if you need to adjust the tones with 4 colours to work with.

cheers
Allan

cometcatcher
23-02-2017, 01:24 PM
That's just insane! In a good way of course. That one is definitely going in my "too hard basket". I'm not even going to try it through your finderscope, since it seems that was used also. :P ;)

marc4darkskies
23-02-2017, 01:45 PM
A very impressive and lovely image Rick! :thumbsup:

RickS
23-02-2017, 08:15 PM
Thanks, Kevin :lol:



Thank you, Marcus.

Stevec35
24-02-2017, 10:30 AM
Absolutely stunning Rick! It doesn't look too red to me but colour balance isn't one of my strong points.

Cheers

Steve

RickS
24-02-2017, 11:05 AM
Thanks, Steve!

SimmoW
24-02-2017, 12:12 PM
Gorgeous Rick, and colours look good to me on this Samsung S7 phone. Nasty, epic job there, bit like putting together a puzzle!

RickS
24-02-2017, 08:24 PM
Thanks, Simon. A Note 7 would be a good phone for viewing this one :lol:

Working on the high res version now using the mosaic as the base...

Cheers,
Rick.

topheart
25-02-2017, 03:49 PM
Wonderful!
Cheers,
Tim

RickS
25-02-2017, 06:28 PM
Thanks, Tim!

atalas
27-02-2017, 05:15 PM
Splendid Rick....awesome detail....it's popped nicely too:thumbsup::thumbsup::thumbsup:

Shiraz
28-02-2017, 09:25 PM
been coming back to this one - colour looks right to me and the way you have captured the complexity of the object and it's delicacy is remarkable. Top shelf.

Octane
01-03-2017, 12:57 PM
Sensational in every sense of the word.

I completely appreciate the effort that goes into mosaics (currently working on a 20-panel monster) and your hard work has paid massive dividends here. I hope you print this one out!

H

RickS
02-03-2017, 09:25 PM
Thanks, Louie!



Thanks very much, Ray.



Much appreciated, H! I'm working on the high res version now using the FSQ/mosaic data as a base instead of the Rok 135. Unfortunately, I'm on holidays and my wife keeps dragging me away from the computer :lol: Look forward to your monster mosaic!