avandonk
16-11-2006, 12:06 PM
Dug up some old (April) data and reprocessed it. The trouble with getting better at processing is all the previous efforts should be redone.
Details
Canon 5DH, 100ED with AP FR so 640mm at f6.4, 12 x3 min ISO 800, Hutech LPR filter, processed with ImagesPlus, stacked with Registar, digitally developed with IP, gradients removed with GradientXterminator, levels and curves in PS, Richarson Lucy enhancement in IP 7x7 for ten cycles.
You can see the image has some noise and looks a little flat because of the ISO of 800. The dynamic range is not as good as you increase the ISO.That is now why I shoot at an ISO of 200 and for 20 minutes exposure. The trouble with 20 min exposures is that your polar alignment and tracking have to be spot on otherwise you get image rotation. The guide star should also be very close to the centre of the image because even with perfect polar alignment image rotation still occurs if the guide star is off image centre.
1.6MB
http://members.optusnet.com.au/~trlee8/L&T_1.jpg
Bert
Details
Canon 5DH, 100ED with AP FR so 640mm at f6.4, 12 x3 min ISO 800, Hutech LPR filter, processed with ImagesPlus, stacked with Registar, digitally developed with IP, gradients removed with GradientXterminator, levels and curves in PS, Richarson Lucy enhancement in IP 7x7 for ten cycles.
You can see the image has some noise and looks a little flat because of the ISO of 800. The dynamic range is not as good as you increase the ISO.That is now why I shoot at an ISO of 200 and for 20 minutes exposure. The trouble with 20 min exposures is that your polar alignment and tracking have to be spot on otherwise you get image rotation. The guide star should also be very close to the centre of the image because even with perfect polar alignment image rotation still occurs if the guide star is off image centre.
1.6MB
http://members.optusnet.com.au/~trlee8/L&T_1.jpg
Bert