PDA

View Full Version here: : 12-11-06 Sunspot 923 from Nambour - now with Luminance layer


[1ponders]
12-11-2006, 03:40 PM
Never one to waste a good opportunity, with no cloud and bright sunshine I thought I'd trial a couple of different eyepieces for Eyepiece projection.

The first three shots are through a UO 12.5mm ortho (thanks Rob C., its a ripper), the second two are through a Vixen LV 15mm. All taken through the Orion ED80 with a ToUcam. The only processing has been waveletting to preference and slight gamma adjustment. Apart from the frames, text and saving for the web in PS there has been no other adjustment.

One thing I noticed when capturing, particularly with the UO, if I played around with the saturation I managed to get quite a good colour gradient that "seems" to follow the sunspot temperature gradient. Don't know if it's wishful thinking but I like it. You will see this clearly in the second shot. Apart from that one shot all other shots have only been adjusted in exposure and gain. It's surprising the different results from the two eyepieces.

There were brief moments of excellent seeing so I captured a number of large avies (1000-1500 frames) at the same settings, converted them to bmps and then processed all the bmps together for a setting. The largest group was 4700 bmps. From these I selected only 100-300 frames for final stacking, depending on the quality of the frames.

Enjoy :)

ps. the longest FL I managed with the Orion was a whooping 5.1 meters, that's nearly the equivalent of using an 8.5X barlow. :eyepop: And still it was performing like a dream. If I ever had any doubts about this little scope, this mornings session has blown them away.

Dennis
12-11-2006, 03:59 PM
Hi Paul

I am gob smacked at the quality of these sunspot images through an 80mm refractor - they are simply stunning.

I was out this morning too, but the seeing was cruddy so I didn't spend too much time capturing avi's; messed around instead seeing if different filters, shorter USB cables etc. would help improve my results – short answer is nope – no differences.

Cheers

Dennis

[1ponders]
12-11-2006, 04:05 PM
I know what you mean Dennis. It's pinned my ears back that for sure.

sheeny
12-11-2006, 04:42 PM
Wow Paul!:eyepop: You know how to advertise as scope don't you!:thumbsup:

Al.

jjjnettie
12-11-2006, 06:27 PM
Marvelous detail Paul.

iceman
12-11-2006, 07:13 PM
Nice results Paul! Well done.

h0ughy
12-11-2006, 08:18 PM
Very ordinary effort that one Paul:D , I mean only 5.1m FL, how mediocre:whistle: :eyepop: . mate i am sure you will do better:scared3: in the future......

btw did you send them off to all the relevant authorities;)

[1ponders]
12-11-2006, 08:46 PM
which ones h0ughy?

h0ughy
12-11-2006, 09:07 PM
:P

Dennis, Mike :rofl: :rofl: well truth being APOD, SW, ME;)

[1ponders]
13-11-2006, 12:31 AM
Something a bit different with processing. I've taken the third image from the top and applied an artificial Luminance layer. It has certainly added something to it, but I need to work on the artifacts.

The first image is the original and the second is with the luminance layer. No other adjustments other than layering and opacity.

CoombellKid
14-11-2006, 12:43 AM
Excellent images Paul!!! I like them all

I was looking at this spot first thing thing morning, she's a big'n!!

regards,CS sunny days

Rob

venus
14-11-2006, 06:50 AM
Great images Paul.
Funny how a little thing like a 'Mercury transit' can spur a cascade of solar 'sunspot' imaging, all that attention may be making the sun a show off;)

seeker372011
14-11-2006, 09:55 PM
OMG
stunning images:bowdown: :bowdown: :bowdown:

[1ponders]
14-11-2006, 10:22 PM
High praise Narayan, thanks.