Robert_T
02-04-2016, 03:32 PM
Hi all, I used to be a regular around here and have been in an out of Astronomy since I was a teenager in the 70's/early 80's... my last real Astro-post here though was in 2008 when I drifted away into photography more as a hobby and have been pursuing that ever since and haven't touched a scope in 8 years despite a lot of equipment lying around the house and in cupboards etc.
I have a whole bunch of questions I'm hoping you good folk could help out with.
For background, my main (almost sole) interest in Astro back in 2008 and years leading up was in planetary imaging using a C9.25 and a range of webcams the last of which I think is in my signature here... I used RGB filter wheels, temperature equalising wand thing, dew zapping hood etc (all of which I still have), and registax etc and managed to squeeze a fair bit of detail from that kit on Jupiter, Mars and Saturn... but reckon I've killed off all the brain cells that led to that.
Anyway, I just took the cap of the C9.25 and found some lovely coin sized patches of fungus growing on the corrector plate. I recall a few years back flooding upstairs actually leaked water into the tube and had to be drained out...so expect it's inside...the mirror by contrast looks pretty pristene... I'm wondering if it's salvageable... ?I don't feel like trying to clean the corrector myself (really had my time doing that stuff)... is there anyone in Australia that offers a professional cleaning service?
Has there been any changes in recent years on the best scopes for planetary imaging? I did have a Mewlon 210 at one point but found I got better from the C9.25... always a trade off between aperture and seeing... Ideally I'd prefer something more like the Mewlon config...compact but with long FL and no corrector plate for quicker tube cooling...then again I'm probably thinking with a 2008 mindset and have no idea if anything better has come along...? I'm all ears.
What about mounts? I have an EQ5 on a star spanner pier and an LX5 meade computerised mount on a heavy tripod...I never got the hang of this mount ... I was never happy with either and would like something a bit more refined.
On cameras what is the "go to" for planetary these days? and is registax still the software of choice? I have a range of Mirrorless Camera, Olympus EM1, EM5ii and the Sony A7rii, but expect their larger sensors would be wasted on planetary? Is the best approach still combining separate Red Green and Blue monochrome images or have colour cameras come along enough to get away from all that fuss?
Maybe there's a scope type (5-6in refractor?) that would suit both planetary and suburban deep sky stacking stuff and my mirrorless cameras could be put to deep sky purposes via multiple short exposure stacking to avoid light pollution impacts.... almost starting to remember stuff long since forgotten here.
Anyway, thanks for sticking with this ramble so far, and if you have any advice or suggestions I would love to hear them.
thanks,
Rob
I have a whole bunch of questions I'm hoping you good folk could help out with.
For background, my main (almost sole) interest in Astro back in 2008 and years leading up was in planetary imaging using a C9.25 and a range of webcams the last of which I think is in my signature here... I used RGB filter wheels, temperature equalising wand thing, dew zapping hood etc (all of which I still have), and registax etc and managed to squeeze a fair bit of detail from that kit on Jupiter, Mars and Saturn... but reckon I've killed off all the brain cells that led to that.
Anyway, I just took the cap of the C9.25 and found some lovely coin sized patches of fungus growing on the corrector plate. I recall a few years back flooding upstairs actually leaked water into the tube and had to be drained out...so expect it's inside...the mirror by contrast looks pretty pristene... I'm wondering if it's salvageable... ?I don't feel like trying to clean the corrector myself (really had my time doing that stuff)... is there anyone in Australia that offers a professional cleaning service?
Has there been any changes in recent years on the best scopes for planetary imaging? I did have a Mewlon 210 at one point but found I got better from the C9.25... always a trade off between aperture and seeing... Ideally I'd prefer something more like the Mewlon config...compact but with long FL and no corrector plate for quicker tube cooling...then again I'm probably thinking with a 2008 mindset and have no idea if anything better has come along...? I'm all ears.
What about mounts? I have an EQ5 on a star spanner pier and an LX5 meade computerised mount on a heavy tripod...I never got the hang of this mount ... I was never happy with either and would like something a bit more refined.
On cameras what is the "go to" for planetary these days? and is registax still the software of choice? I have a range of Mirrorless Camera, Olympus EM1, EM5ii and the Sony A7rii, but expect their larger sensors would be wasted on planetary? Is the best approach still combining separate Red Green and Blue monochrome images or have colour cameras come along enough to get away from all that fuss?
Maybe there's a scope type (5-6in refractor?) that would suit both planetary and suburban deep sky stacking stuff and my mirrorless cameras could be put to deep sky purposes via multiple short exposure stacking to avoid light pollution impacts.... almost starting to remember stuff long since forgotten here.
Anyway, thanks for sticking with this ramble so far, and if you have any advice or suggestions I would love to hear them.
thanks,
Rob