Colour of supernova in Centaurus A

[Greg Bock]

Wow, the red/orange colour of the supernova buried behind the dust lanes of Centaurus A (NGC5128) is very obvious in my colour image tonight taken at home from Runaway Bay. Complete with the usual light pollution from the Gold Coast.

Meade LX200R 14"F7, ST10XE, EQ8 and 6 minutes each L,R, G, B
https://www.flickr.com/photos/128593545@N07/24391630034/in/dateposted-public/

[Placidus]

Convincing.

[RickS]

Nicely separated from the foreground star too, Greg, compared to a lot of the images I've seen. Probably a combination of aperture and careful focus :thumbsup:

[strongmanmike]

Great capture Greg, looks like a carbon star :thumbsup:

Mike

[glend]

Astroron's comments on my image , in the other General forum thread, (#64 &67), showing the orange SN in NGC5128 led me to believe it was due to 'dust' in the gas cloud in the galaxy, what is called 'extinction' I believe, as we see in some sunsets on earth. It is good to see more orange images emerging. I don't know if we can make assumptions about the star type without more information, including how the colour changes as the SN fades.

[multiweb]

Nice catch Greg. :thumbsup:

[pfitzgerald]

Nicely imaged Greg.

Paul

[Ryderscope]

Excellent catch. Good one.

[DiscoDuck]

Wow. Nice work to separate it so cleanly from the adjacent star. Congrats.
Paul

[Greg Bock]

Hi all, thanks for your comments here.
Yes, the purpose of the image was to focus on the SN and its separation from the bright field star next to it. Also, I wanted to show the unusual red/orange colour, which as Glen wrote above, is due to the galactic dust and cold gas dimming it. Normally, a SN explosion is much whiter, almost blue, so this one is particularly interesting due to its location within NGC5128.
The key to achieving a clean separation is to tailor the exposure time to the stars, not the diffuse glow of the galaxy. So, using RGB filters, I limited the exposures to 60 seconds each, and then combined them. The other reason for keeping the exposures short is to avoid saturating the pixels to their maximum value, which would result in a white appearance. By keeping the subframe exposures short enough, the colour of the SN, and other faint stars for that matter, can be captured too.
Of course, you need a steady sky, and a long focal length too. I'm very lucky at Runaway Bay because my scope is 3 floors above the ground, so I avoid close ground currents, and I also have plenty of clean laminar air flow from the Pacific Ocean 500m away which is more uniform in temperature than if it flowed over suburban landscapes before it gets to me.
So, while I may have one of the worst locations for light pollution, it is surprisingly great for steady seeing.

[Greg Bock]

In case you are curious, here is a pic last night of the scope on my back terrace overlooking the glitter strip to the south as the Southern Cross rises above the glow. Big image here:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/128593545@N07/24391621244/in/dateposted-public/

[blink138]

haha greg surely that is an impossible imaging location? (though obviously not!)
pat