View Full Version here: : The deep web...
Peter Ward
15-12-2015, 05:23 PM
The title is actually a bit of a misnomer....just 80 minutes of exposure
...much of which was gleaned through "sucker holes" and constant guide-star-fades in Sydney's seemingly ever-clouded skies.
Used a bigger 16" hammer for this spider :) So many tantalising fine structures are begging for more exposure time (and colour data)....but the sound of thunder rolling over the valley opposite hints "not tonight"
The link is here (http://www.atscope.com.au/BRO/gallery368.html)
Placidus
15-12-2015, 06:17 PM
Spider spider twisting tight!
Very fine, Peter. The core region is excellent. The 16" is doing a beautiful job.
We share your pain regarding the weather - we're suffering withdrawal symptoms so severe that we're actually writing manuals instead of doing stuff.
Peter Ward
15-12-2015, 06:57 PM
Thanks Mike 'n Trish. Due a short holiday soon, this will be all from me for 2015.
Somnium
15-12-2015, 07:04 PM
wow, looks like the start of a fantastic image. the cloud cover in Sydney has been extremely frustrating !!! good to see you got something
Slawomir
15-12-2015, 07:42 PM
Great result Peter, fantastic detail and only 80 minutes of exposure!
Stevec35
15-12-2015, 10:09 PM
Wonderfully sharp Peter! Looks like the start of a classic Tarantula.
Cheers
Steve
alpal
15-12-2015, 10:17 PM
Hi Peter,
some excellent detail there that I've never seen before.
Well done - you must be more than happy with this new scope.
cheers
Allan
Paul Haese
15-12-2015, 10:36 PM
It's going to be an interesting image. I like the tiny stars but tell me you are going to get 3nm filters for that beast soon. How was your seeing on night?
Peter Ward
15-12-2015, 11:40 PM
Seeing was good but not great....AO would have really given the data some snap, but no reasonable guide stars were to be found with the 7nm H-alpha in place. Guiding corrections were once every 5 seconds!
Ta. It's a magnificent instrument. Just wish I could get some more time on it :lol:
Thanks gentlemen....I suppose the 80 minutes is relative...a 6" scope would take 9 or so hours to get the same amount of flux.
Andy01
16-12-2015, 07:33 AM
Hard to argue with 16" of light bucket gathering power! Clearly in this case, Size does matter! Nice one Peter :)
Ironbird
17-12-2015, 07:39 AM
liberal application of secret sauce generated the following;
all rights belong to User: Peter Ward
Edit: Banned User
multiweb
17-12-2015, 02:10 PM
Superb shot Peter. Great details and res. :thumbsup:
alpal
17-12-2015, 07:46 PM
Hopefully you'll get some clear nights over the next few days
but the hot weather may not be good for seeing conditions.
cheers
Allan
LewisM
18-12-2015, 04:10 PM
Really nice well executed image of the only DSO I truly dislike. (it's just a nebula that has never excited me one zot)
Slawomir
18-12-2015, 08:18 PM
Is that right? What about a request made some time ago to play with someone's data of the Tarantula... ;) :rofl:
Peter Ward
19-12-2015, 02:35 PM
Unlikely. Currently in New York. Didn't pack the 'scope as it just wasn't going to fit in the overhead locker.
Snow flurries are also a possibility here. Seeing likely to be bad. Very Bad.
vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.