AlexN
11-10-2015, 12:56 PM
Here are a couple I've been working on over the past week or so.. I have a stack of data of a few other fields too however with a few bugs in my imaging system I'm not happy enough with them to show them at this stage..
In any case...
Here is NGC104 and NGC55.
NGC104 Details.
130x 60sec unguided subs.
NGC55 Details.
109x60s + 45x120s unguided subs.
Canon 450D full spectrum modded
300mm f/2.8 lens
Belt modded HEQ5 Pro
I'm happy to report that after extensive testing the HEQ5 seems to absolutely perfect, I went through hell with it when I bought it as the previous owner did not seem to care much about it, and had also had a shot at doing some tuning with apparently 0 knowledge of how it operates. After a strip, clean, bearing replacements, belt drive modification, polish of the RA worm and worm wheel and a re-shim followed by very careful worm adjustment I am confident that with a more careful polar alignment this mount would manage 3 minutes or maybe even more of unguided exposures with my 300mm lens... Despite not being a long focal length, the setup is still about 6kg between the lens, custom made motorized focuser bracket and finder-guider mount etc (got the finderguider in place, just no guide camera yet) At the moment I'm limited to 2 minute subs from here at f/2.8 due to light pollution however with guiding and dark skies I intend to use this rig to dig deep for dusty wonders of the galaxy.
Still working out some bugs in the imaging train, when I removed the UV/IR block and the anti aliasing filter I inadvertently changed the backfocus spacing due to the optical thickness of those two filters.. as such the lens shows poor field correction however I've got a couple of options on the burner to fix this..
Don Goldman has offered for a moderate price to make me a Lum filter to replace the optical distance of the filters removed, thus blocking the unwanted areas of the spectrum (Deep IR and UV) and correcting my backfocus distance which will return the stars to perfection (as they were prior to me pulling the filters) The other option is to simply pull out the sensor spacing shims from within the camera, moving the sensor forward ~0.9mm which will still be .3mm shy of standard, but it would have to be far better than the 1.2mm out that I am now...
Im inclined to try the spacers first as while the cost of the filter from Don is not extrememly expensive considering its a one off, it is a lot of money that I'd prefer to be spending on a guide camera...
In any case...
Here is NGC104 and NGC55.
NGC104 Details.
130x 60sec unguided subs.
NGC55 Details.
109x60s + 45x120s unguided subs.
Canon 450D full spectrum modded
300mm f/2.8 lens
Belt modded HEQ5 Pro
I'm happy to report that after extensive testing the HEQ5 seems to absolutely perfect, I went through hell with it when I bought it as the previous owner did not seem to care much about it, and had also had a shot at doing some tuning with apparently 0 knowledge of how it operates. After a strip, clean, bearing replacements, belt drive modification, polish of the RA worm and worm wheel and a re-shim followed by very careful worm adjustment I am confident that with a more careful polar alignment this mount would manage 3 minutes or maybe even more of unguided exposures with my 300mm lens... Despite not being a long focal length, the setup is still about 6kg between the lens, custom made motorized focuser bracket and finder-guider mount etc (got the finderguider in place, just no guide camera yet) At the moment I'm limited to 2 minute subs from here at f/2.8 due to light pollution however with guiding and dark skies I intend to use this rig to dig deep for dusty wonders of the galaxy.
Still working out some bugs in the imaging train, when I removed the UV/IR block and the anti aliasing filter I inadvertently changed the backfocus spacing due to the optical thickness of those two filters.. as such the lens shows poor field correction however I've got a couple of options on the burner to fix this..
Don Goldman has offered for a moderate price to make me a Lum filter to replace the optical distance of the filters removed, thus blocking the unwanted areas of the spectrum (Deep IR and UV) and correcting my backfocus distance which will return the stars to perfection (as they were prior to me pulling the filters) The other option is to simply pull out the sensor spacing shims from within the camera, moving the sensor forward ~0.9mm which will still be .3mm shy of standard, but it would have to be far better than the 1.2mm out that I am now...
Im inclined to try the spacers first as while the cost of the filter from Don is not extrememly expensive considering its a one off, it is a lot of money that I'd prefer to be spending on a guide camera...