Log in

View Full Version here: : I.C. 2602 close up


raymo
22-08-2015, 10:57 PM
20 x 30 secs @ ISO 1600.
raymo

Camelopardalis
22-08-2015, 11:16 PM
Nicely rendered raymo but looks like it's missing a big planetary neb in the middle :lol:

raymo
22-08-2015, 11:28 PM
If I had the faintest idea of how to superimpose one image onto another,
I would gladly put one there for you.
cheers raymo

Somnium
23-08-2015, 01:02 AM
Very nice Ray. there is a little coma around the edges, do you have a corrector? if not, the investment will really pay dividends. it looks, otherwise, fantastic.

raymo
23-08-2015, 12:31 PM
Thanks Aidan, never been able to find the cash; I generally crop most of it out. This image was originally a much wider field.
raymo

Somnium
23-08-2015, 04:59 PM
fair enough,

I am in the process of upgrading some equipment. I have a mkII Baader MPPC that may become redundant in a few months (could be up to 9 months). If you want it, i will make a note to PM you when the new scope arrives. better for it to get some use then to sit in a draw.

raymo
23-08-2015, 06:15 PM
That would be brilliant; I'm sure I could find something toward the cost of it.
cheers Raymo

Somnium
23-08-2015, 06:34 PM
don't worry about it, the payment will be seeing the images you put up with it. i will put a reminder in my calendar now.

Camelopardalis
23-08-2015, 07:39 PM
I could do it, just can't guarantee it would be pretty :lol:

I think I'll enjoy the beauty as it is!

raymo
23-08-2015, 08:20 PM
Aidan,thank you so much for your generosity, but as I dwell in the mud at the bottom of the astroimaging pond, don't expect any miraculous
improvement in my pics.
Dunk, the composite image might have been an interesting addition to my own picture gallery.
raymo

Camelopardalis
24-08-2015, 09:55 AM
How about this mate? :D

Somnium
24-08-2015, 10:23 AM
Nice, this can spawn a whole new field of astronomy ... theoretical astrophotography

raymo
24-08-2015, 12:00 PM
That's not messy Dunk, looks great. A few newbies might get a bit confused though;" I didn't think The Helix was anywhere near 2602 "
:screwy::screwy::screwy:
raymo

cometcatcher
24-08-2015, 01:39 PM
Nice one Ray. Yeah it's a pity the Southern Pleiades didn't have some neb like it's northern cousin. Maybe there's some really faint galactic nebulosity in there that only comes out with 100 hours exposure.

raymo
24-08-2015, 02:14 PM
Thanks Kevin. There is faint nebulosity beginning to show; I think it would be quite obvious with much less than 100 hrs.
raymo

5ash
24-08-2015, 05:47 PM
Lovely picture , makes a change to see an interesting open cluster of stars or an asterism.
Regards philip

raymo
24-08-2015, 06:04 PM
Thanks Philip. I got some subs of the bug last night, but not happy with
the results; I might try with a barlow, needs more than 1000mm f/l.
raymo

Camelopardalis
24-08-2015, 07:41 PM
Never fear, I flipped the Helix to avoid confusion :lol:

raymo
24-08-2015, 07:53 PM
:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:

codemonkey
24-08-2015, 10:39 PM
Nice work raymo! I love open clusters, but they just don't look right without diffraction spikes, so, using only refractors, I never image them.

Almost tempted to stick something over the objective to create my own spikes...... yes, I'm a heathen.

Somnium
24-08-2015, 10:44 PM
interesting approach ... :question:

raymo
24-08-2015, 10:57 PM
Thank you Lee, and you would be far from the first to do it.
raymo