bobbyf
28-07-2015, 08:07 AM
Last month I did a comparison of the Waxing Gibbous moon using a Nikon D7000 and a Canon 1100D. See here:-
http://www.iceinspace.com.au/forum/showthread.php?t=136269
In the meantime I have acquired an IR modded D7000, and the weather finally cleared up long enough for me to use it at night.
I only got 16 shots and stacked the best 70% of them.
Processed in camera raw, then registax and PS.
I didn't think the seeing was all that great, but I seem to be getting more detail with the IR camera.
Is this expected, due to lack of visible light, or is it placebo, or processing / seeing differences do you think?
Higher res version
http://www.astrobin.com/full/197859/0/
Cheers
Bob
http://www.iceinspace.com.au/forum/showthread.php?t=136269
In the meantime I have acquired an IR modded D7000, and the weather finally cleared up long enough for me to use it at night.
I only got 16 shots and stacked the best 70% of them.
Processed in camera raw, then registax and PS.
I didn't think the seeing was all that great, but I seem to be getting more detail with the IR camera.
Is this expected, due to lack of visible light, or is it placebo, or processing / seeing differences do you think?
Higher res version
http://www.astrobin.com/full/197859/0/
Cheers
Bob