Sky Quality Metre Correlation with Light Pollution Map

[glend]

Starman over on Cloudy Nights has put up a comparative reference of SQM reading and light pollution map colours. The thread is here, check Starman's entry down the page:

http://www.cloudynights.com/topic/497905-sqm-readings/page-2#entry6558839

Extract is here:

"From correlating colors on the LP map (even the new one, with 15 shades) to wide SQM readings, I get the following:
Green zone 20.9-21.1
Dark Green zone 21.1-21.35
Blue zone 21.35-21.5
Dark blue zone 21.5-21.6
Light gray zone 21.6-21.7
dark gray zone 21.7-21.8
black zone--we (USA) don't have any black zones."

My personal SQM readings are supportive of Starman's conclusions, based on the Australian light pollution map.
I live in a Green Zone and can achieve readings near 21 in good conditions. Bretti NSW a dark gray zone, returns 21.77 on a regular basis during new moon periods; likewise Chaffey Dam is in the same reading category.
Does this correlation stand up to your experience?

Light pollution map is located here:

http://www.lightpollutionmap.info/#zoom=6&lat=-3617241.46888&lon=16966832.57265&layers=B0TFFFTT

Just move it around (and zoom in or out) to locate your area.

[oilydog]

How do you measure your light pollution?

[AussieTrooper]

Looks pretty accurate. I'm in an orange zone, and the western sky (over the city) is about a full magnitude worse than when looking east.

[glend]

Just look up your location n the light pollution map and note the colour, check that against the list in the original post.

[LewisM]

I live and image in an orange-red zone.

LP filter, UV/IR filter, NB filters... but still do LRGB.