rogerg
14-09-2006, 10:12 AM
This is a very nice face-on galaxy that I stumbled upon. My image doesn't really do it justice.
I had quite poor viewing conditions (not sure why, but while it's been clear the last few nights it's also been very turbulent). And the moon rose just after midnight, together with the object crossing the meridian at the same time. So none of the images after midnight were usable but that was expected.
I've been having trouble with plate solving lately, seems to only occasionally work, so I'm not able to reliably automated it to move between objects, so I just leave it taking the same object all night regardless of the conditions/moon/focus. I would have scripted a re-focus, but it was choosing to re-focus on the galaxy which wasn't doing a lot of good for it's accuracy!
I hope to re-process it soon, there's much more outer faint detail in the raw images, just a case of getting it and not the noise in the processed images.
I took 15 x 1200sec but only used 7 x 1200 sec.
http://www.rogergroom.com/rogergroom/esh_rog_item.jsp?Item=422
Roger.
I had quite poor viewing conditions (not sure why, but while it's been clear the last few nights it's also been very turbulent). And the moon rose just after midnight, together with the object crossing the meridian at the same time. So none of the images after midnight were usable but that was expected.
I've been having trouble with plate solving lately, seems to only occasionally work, so I'm not able to reliably automated it to move between objects, so I just leave it taking the same object all night regardless of the conditions/moon/focus. I would have scripted a re-focus, but it was choosing to re-focus on the galaxy which wasn't doing a lot of good for it's accuracy!
I hope to re-process it soon, there's much more outer faint detail in the raw images, just a case of getting it and not the noise in the processed images.
I took 15 x 1200sec but only used 7 x 1200 sec.
http://www.rogergroom.com/rogergroom/esh_rog_item.jsp?Item=422
Roger.