View Full Version here: : Oh, my... Did my little camera do that.?
2020BC
23-08-2006, 06:08 PM
:eyepop:
With a Canon 350D, an LXD-75 mount and an Orion 80ED scope you gets to see STUFF...
mickoking
23-08-2006, 06:11 PM
WOW what a fantastic image :thumbsup: I love the colours. great shot Bill :)
Orion
23-08-2006, 06:34 PM
They sure are beautiful images. Congratulations.
Striker
23-08-2006, 06:51 PM
Teriffic image Bill....they are a great combo the canon 350D and 80ED.
[1ponders]
23-08-2006, 06:57 PM
That is a really great shot Bill. :2thumbs: Congrats for a winning duo :party:
Lester
23-08-2006, 07:13 PM
Hi Bill,
that is eye catching, love the colour.
acropolite
23-08-2006, 07:48 PM
Fantastic Bill, amazing detail and colour, is the 350D modified??
2020BC
23-08-2006, 08:29 PM
No, it's unmod. I'm too chicken to pull the I/R filter out....:lol: Leastwise 'til I get tired of the camera, which is yeah never going to happen if it let's me do stuff like this...:rofl: Anyhoo, it's not so bad at picking up the reds once you accumulate a shed load of data.
If the unmod camera is say five times less sensitive to H-alpha than a mod camera, all you have to do is collect five times more data. Simple.:D
sheeny
23-08-2006, 09:21 PM
Wow!:eyepop: I see you have your tradesmark signature multiple diffraction spikes going. I like it... I suppose the more you stack the subtler the spikes will get...
Al.
ballaratdragons
23-08-2006, 09:25 PM
Hey Bill,
What's with the "Oh, my... Did my little camera do that.?"
I wouldn't call a Canon 350D a 'SMALL' camera. Especially when I use a Toucam and a Kodak Easyshare pocket camera.
I'll swap ya :P
avandonk
23-08-2006, 10:35 PM
Really nice result Bill. You will come to other side (modded) when you are ready. It is not the be all and by no means the ultimate solution. It is as you said, only saves time. The real fun is pushing the equipment we have to it's limits by learning . If we wanted to 'win' we would all have 8M mirrors and 300MPixel cooled CCD's.
Bert
2020BC
23-08-2006, 10:40 PM
I find it amazing that an ordinary Joe can buy a family camera from Dick Smith and put it on a modest telescope (or even just a barn door or tripod) to get pictures of distant invisible things. When I was a kid this would have been impossible. Though film might have been an option back then there was no internet and definitely no one around to talk to and learn how to shoot it. The whole thing today is altogether extraordinary.
ballaratdragons
23-08-2006, 11:18 PM
So true Bill.
It was only a few years back that we "ooooo'd" and "aaaahhh'd" at the pics that NASA sent back from space, and now we are taking pics that they were taking with Millions of Dollars 10 years ago!!!!!
You are right, it is amazing!
jjjnettie
23-08-2006, 11:47 PM
Bill,
How long were your exposures?
h0ughy
24-08-2006, 07:48 AM
Absolutely awesome images!:eyepop: And JJJ you should know better that to ask a guy how long he exposes;) :lol:
tornado33
24-08-2006, 01:22 PM
Yes excellent work there. Weve come a long way since the old days of using Hypered film and waiting days or weeks to see if we got what we were after.
Scott
i keep them short in the cold for obvious reasons ;)
middy
24-08-2006, 04:20 PM
Significant shrinkage ?????? (One for the Seinfeld fans :lol: )
2020BC
24-08-2006, 09:03 PM
100 minutes collected on three nights (so three sets of diffraction spikes).
vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.