Log in

View Full Version here: : NGC 253: Without and With Annotation **EDITED**


nandopg
30-09-2014, 08:15 AM
Hello,
For not to be too long and for those interested in the topic, please have a look on the article:


http://iopscience.iop.org/0004-637X/636/2/685/pdf/0004-637X_636_2_685.pdf


Some Databook Information For NGC 253
Right Ascension: 00:47.6 (h:m)
Declination: -25:17 (deg:m)
Distance: ~ 10 million light years
Apparent Dimension: 26.4 x 6 (arc min)
Magnittude: 7.2
Object Type: Barred Spiral Galaxy


Image Details:
Luminance: 15x900sec bin 1x1
Blue: 15x600sec bin 2x2
Red: 15x600sec bin 2x2
Green: 12x600sec bin 2x2


Telescope: Skywatcher Esprit 120mm f/7
CCD: Trius SX-694
StarLight Express Mini Filter Wheel and OAG
CCD Guiding: Lodestar
Capture and guiding software: MaxIm DL 6.0
Mount: EQ-6 Pro
Processing: PixInsight
Bias, Darks and Flats applied



For high rresolution images click on the links below

Image without overlay (http://cdn.astrobin.com/images/thumbs/f80c4ee162880b57f0b36d8372ca1a02.18 24x0_q100_watermark.jpg)


Image with overlay (http://cdn.astrobin.com/images/thumbs/566d3a20c7315bbc687ae280ea9ec341.18 24x0_q100_watermark.jpg)

In annotated version, please pay attention mainly for the background galaxies and their PGC catalog's numbers. They represent a wealth of new information for styding.

Thanks for looking,

Fernando

** A note about the edition: The image has been rotated by 90 degrees, as suggested by Rick, to improve visibility in regular monitors.
Thanks for the suggestion Rick!! **

Shiraz
30-09-2014, 06:30 PM
that is a really good image Fernando:thumbsup:. lovely colour and detail is excellent.

maybe suggest that you realign it so that it runs across the screen - make it easier to look at.

RickS
30-09-2014, 07:06 PM
A very nice 253, Fernando! It's always interesting to see what AnnotateImage picks up in these fields. I have been thinking about adding some new catalogs...

Ross G
30-09-2014, 09:37 PM
Great looking galaxy photo Fernando.

I love the colour.

Ross.

nandopg
01-10-2014, 12:07 AM
Ray,
Thank you very much. You are absolutely right, I've never framed an object so badly:mad2: like I did this one. I think that if I rotate, I would lose too much space around, apart from to lose some small details because the re-sampling is inevitable. Unless you have another suggestion to do this, do you have ?



Hi Rick,
Thank you. I also think so. Looking the background galaxies in the PGC catalog and putting some research on some of them is an endless intellectual activity, great to keep our background updated.

Best Regards,
Fernando



Ross,
Thank you very much, appreciate your kind comment.
Fernando

Shiraz
01-10-2014, 07:43 AM
A simple rotation by 90 degrees should not involve resampling, so detail will be retained. Please don't think that I am criticising your image in any way, just suggesting that it would fit better on the average computer screen if rotated.

nandopg
01-10-2014, 10:02 AM
Oh Ray, please don,t think on this. I accepted your suggestion as a very good one and I have to thank you for your time to reply this second time. I think you are right as for the 90 deg rotation. I will be doing that tomorrow and uploading the new version.

Best Regards my friend,

Fernando

nebulosity.
01-10-2014, 10:45 AM
Very nice image! Great work. :thumbsup:

Jo

weathermon
01-10-2014, 12:06 PM
Fantastic work with 253! Well done :thumbsup:

PeterEde
01-10-2014, 12:30 PM
Great shot

nandopg
04-10-2014, 07:47 AM
Hi Jo,
Thank you for the thumbs up


Hello,
Thanks for the warm evaluation


Thank you !!

strongmanmike
04-10-2014, 11:29 AM
Hey Nando, that's a good 253 and I like to see it with some good colour like you have showing here:thumbsup:

Mike

nandopg
07-10-2014, 04:32 AM
Hi Michael,
Thanks for your comment. A little color saturation without overcooked it keeps the beauty of the object.
Thanks also for reinforcing this concept!

Best Regards,

Fernando