PDA

View Full Version here: : M42 in Orion, LLRGB experiment


Amaranthus
31-08-2014, 09:26 PM
The great nebula in Orion, taken just before first light on 29 August using an ED80T CF astrograph with an Orion Starshoot G3 mono CCD. My 'real AP' learning kit.

This is an experimental image, prior to my work on some objects with deep integration times (LRGB data collected, now acquiring some Ha for these).

Orion was low in the morning sky, and I only had less than 2 hours to capture all my data due to the balance of needing Orion to rise to a sufficient altitude, and to avoid the brightening astronomic dawn.

The image is composed of the following:
Lum = 18 x 30 sec + 23 x 10 sec
R, G & B = 15 x 30 sec for each channel

I then created a synthetic luminance channel using an exposure-based weighting of the L30, L10 and R, G and B luminances. The L and RGB chrominance channels were then processed separately before final combination.

All subs were unbinned (35 minutes total integration). Guided using PHD2 with an ASI120MM-S camera and an OAG.

Captured and pre-processed with flats (light box), bad pixel map and bias in Nebulosity. Post-processed in StarTools.

Full capture/processing details and higher rez version here:
http://www.astrobin.com/117345/

This camera/astrograph is heavily undersampled at 4.6 arcseconds per pixel (and the StarShoot G3 chip is small and yields relatively low resolution images, at 752 x 582 pixels). To overcome these constraints, I used drizzle alignment in Nebulosity (this brought it up to an equivalent 2.5 megapixel image). However, there is some graininess in the image due to a lack of sufficient subs, especially in the lower signal areas (outer regions).

But overall, I deem this experiment to have been a success.

EDIT: Alternative, more traditional version (using the same data, but different post-processing), now also attached.

raymo
31-08-2014, 10:09 PM
Beautiful Barry. Assuming that you haven't posted it on the main forum,
they don't know what they're missing.
raymo

Amaranthus
31-08-2014, 10:14 PM
Thanks Raymo. As I noted, it lacks 'depth' due to the very short integration time, but at least it illustrates some of the detail in the nebulosity, even if it misses out on most of the fainter traceries. Glad you liked it!

cometcatcher
01-09-2014, 12:30 AM
That looks great. A very ghostly look to it out of the "norm" for this object.

ZeroID
01-09-2014, 06:06 AM
Nice to see some detail and structure in the core area despite the softness. Most cases you are lucky just to pick up the stars in there.
Well done

Amaranthus
01-09-2014, 04:36 PM
Here is an alternative interpretation of the same data -- a very different approach to the post-processing. It's a more 'traditional' look for M42, certainly. Amazing how much detail has come out in 35 min of total integration (albeit rather noisy...)

Rex
02-09-2014, 07:17 PM
Nice going Barry. Certainly some nice detail in there for only 35 minutes. Good job.

raymo
02-09-2014, 07:21 PM
They're both rippers.
raymo

Amaranthus
02-09-2014, 08:46 PM
Thanks Rex and Raymo, feedback is always super appreciated. It's certainly motivated me to 'go deep' on M42 later this year when it's at a higher altitude! (and probably try some narrowband on it...)