View Full Version here: : No thread dedicated to the super moon?
OzStarGazer
11-08-2014, 09:08 AM
So... I hoped there would be a thread dedicated to the super moon... :lol: I have taken some pics but still have to check them on my computer.
I don't want to expose myself too much by posting my pics in an astrophotography thread.... :P Have you taken pics? Should we start a common thread like for Saturn's occultation? ;) :)
PeterEde
11-08-2014, 12:18 PM
I posted last nights but happy to have common thread. Will do more tonight.
chellaxy
11-08-2014, 12:28 PM
I think that's a fab idea, here are some of mine ... shame about the clouds in Perth though, as my friend and I got a great viewpoint to see the moon rise beyond the city
https://fbcdn-sphotos-a-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-xfa1/t1.0-9/10570336_1449991495273737_907124428 0236676518_n.jpg
https://fbcdn-sphotos-b-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-xap1/t1.0-9/10603550_1449991371940416_430750113 4360757824_n.jpg
https://fbcdn-sphotos-d-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-xpa1/v/t1.0-9/p480x480/10522578_1449991458607074_357425683 3716598694_n.jpg?oh=b3d918adab6e532 961e49481450455c4&oe=54812925&__gda__=1417678304_699de78f63c7a961 4a3106cdd2b6fa5a
https://fbcdn-sphotos-d-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-xpa1/t1.0-9/1454584_1449991608607059_7979692493 459562072_n.jpg
:D
OzStarGazer
11-08-2014, 01:57 PM
They look great, thanks for posting them!
So... I will start with two videos of CLOUDS and a moon behind them struggling to get through:
http://vid1227.photobucket.com/albums/ee432/AussiePhotographer/MVI_3318_zps118b1cf3.mp4
http://vid1227.photobucket.com/albums/ee432/AussiePhotographer/MVI_3320_zpsd74e4464.mp4
And some pics of the moon... They looked sooooo much better on the live-view screen... But the ND filter did cause a lot of blurring that was not visible on the live-view screen, so I had to sharpen them a bit. There is also a normal (naked-eye) photo of the moon completely surrounded by clouds... I am a bit disappointed because I thought they were better... :( My fav pic is probably the fourth from the left, but it could be much better. It isn't easy to take a photo of a super moon!
The moon itself was so huge it had to be perfectly centered or would not fit in the FOV, even with my lowest-power eyepiece. :)
james_n
12-08-2014, 06:58 AM
Fantastic pics! So sharp and so many details in spite of the brightness of the supermoon. :thumbsup:
May I ask how you took them?
PeterEde
12-08-2014, 07:10 AM
Did a small video
http://youtu.be/61i0-tg4LDc
OzStarGazer
12-08-2014, 01:25 PM
Thanks! :) Oh, just with my refractor Celestron 90AZ and a compact camera (afocal mode)... I also took some prime focus pics, but they are not better, even a bit worse... (I couldn't use a filter in prime focus).
james_n
12-08-2014, 02:22 PM
Cool.
Many pics I have seen look uniformly gray, even in the Wikipedia
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/ca/Supermoon_comparison.jpg
so I thought yours were really nice. Even the less sharp one (the blue one) is really cool and looks so mystical and mysterious.
OzStarGazer
12-08-2014, 03:01 PM
Many look grey because of the use of filters (necessary with a full moon). Mine looked a bit grey too. I did some sharpening, enhanced contrast etc. in Photoshop. :)
PeterEde
12-08-2014, 04:02 PM
Filters. eh that's what photoshop is for
OzStarGazer
12-08-2014, 10:35 PM
:) Yes, but I actually meant that I used a ND filter, then because the ND made the images a bit dull I sharpened them in PS.
You know, this evening I took some pics without a filter at all and on the liveview screen of the camera they look very clear even if I zoom in (I can see the craters on the terminator very well). Maybe I shouldn't have used a ND filter at all the other day, but a super moon is at its brightest and I thought it would be better.... Well, at any rate PS came to the rescue... :)
james_n
13-08-2014, 06:26 AM
What is a ND filter? :)
OzStarGazer
13-08-2014, 08:20 AM
It is a "neutrality density" filter and is used to cut down the glare, that's why images look dull when you use one, but sometimes it is necessary when the moon is very bright. It is better to use one and then fix the images in PS than not to use one and then the images are washed out with light and cannot be fixed. But with digital photography you can experiment as much as you want of course, as you can just delete the images you don't like. :) Yesterday for example I took some nice pics without a ND filter, but of course it was not "full" moon any more...
james_n
13-08-2014, 12:54 PM
Thanks for the explanation. :thumbsup:
vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.