View Full Version here: : quick red spider
Shiraz
18-07-2014, 10:23 AM
Hi
Clouds have been overwhelming lately, but I had about an hour of good Ha and another hour of so-so Ha data of this object from a month ago. Put it with a little bit of colour taken recently (in desparation) while the moon was up.
The image is scaled by 150% since this thing is very small, but it is a quite spectacular bipolar PN with quite large faint extensions beyond the four bright lobe edges and a very bright core with a small darker central region - and yes, it is red! Thanks for looking. Regards ray
SW250f4 with RCC1
SX 694
EQ6
HaRGB
gregbradley
18-07-2014, 10:56 AM
A very interesting object. A bit like the Butterfly Nebula.
Greg.
multiweb
18-07-2014, 11:16 AM
Was expecting the tarantula. Never seen that one before. Pretty tiny.
Shiraz
18-07-2014, 01:23 PM
Thanks Greg. these bipolar PNs all seem to have quite similar structure. Although this one is called the red spider, it certainly does look like a butterfly as well. the Hubble shots of this show some very beautiful and graceful detail in the clouds - I could only get a rough glimpse of the detail, but it was still worth doing.
thanks Marc. yep it's small - the main nebula has about the same angular extent as Jupiter.
RickS
18-07-2014, 01:45 PM
Tricky and interesting target, Ray. Well done!
strongmanmike
18-07-2014, 02:32 PM
Excellent quicky Ray! Love the negative view too, shows some nice faint extensions, very cool little PN that. There are so many out there...I recon if I ever got automated (one day :rolleyes: and prefereably with a longer FL scope) I'd like to do a few nights script and hammer some quicky PN's one after the other.
Mike
tilbrook@rbe.ne
18-07-2014, 04:59 PM
Geez Ray that's challenging!
I presume it's NGC 6537 in Sagittarius ?
If so guide 8 has it at 15 arc seconds, that's small!
Good imaging BTW!:thumbsup:
Cheers,
Justin.
Regulus
18-07-2014, 05:13 PM
That's impressive Ray.
Shiraz
18-07-2014, 07:21 PM
Thanks very much Rick
thanks Mike. what sort of pixel scale do you think is needed? - a bit more image scale is definitely worthwhile for these things.
yep, its 6537 - not big and flashy, but I think it is fascinating nonetheless.
Thanks Trevor
Rod771
19-07-2014, 04:47 PM
Nice work Ray! Certainly more to it as revealed in the negative. Well done!
Shiraz
22-07-2014, 05:02 PM
thanks Rod. regards Ray
vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.