Log in

View Full Version here: : M20 taken at SPSP14


Retrograde
02-07-2014, 12:25 PM
Hi All - it has taken me a while to finish processing this as I've been busy with other things. I struggled badly with the colour-balance in this image so I tried stacking raw subs (rather than converting them to tifs first) & it seems to be a big improvement.
This is my first attempt at this object (since a failed effort back in the film days) & probably my best deep-sky image so far.

14 x 1 min unguided subs at ISO 1600 through a Pentax K-5 attached to an ED102 on a Vixen SP mount.

bobbyf
02-07-2014, 12:50 PM
Well done Pete
Thats really nice mate :thumbsup:

I wish i could get 1 min unguided! Will try again tonight, now that i've upgraded the mount software
Cheers
Bob

cometcatcher
02-07-2014, 01:09 PM
Looks good Pete. :thumbsup:

Retrograde
02-07-2014, 02:36 PM
Thanks guys



Well that was my first attempt at 1 min and there is a smidgen of tracking error if you look closely. I might try leaving out a couple of the worst subs & re-stacking or try & fix the stars in post-processing if I can work out how.
Good luck with your own efforts bob I'm sure it can be done :thumbsup:

I was previously able to get perfectly round stars on 30 sec subs but I had a few power issues on the night at SPSP (I tried a new 12v-9v adapter which was actually putting out 10.6v causing the drive motor to run fast which meant I had to fall back to using 9v batteries) all of which affected my drift-alignment.
Frankly I'm amazed that my old Vixen mount performs so well. 28 years old - unused for around 20 of those years - and never serviced or re-greased or anything :)

ncorreia
02-07-2014, 02:54 PM
Really nice M20! I gotta start trying for 1min unguided :)

SimmoW
02-07-2014, 06:42 PM
Yes that's a goodie, and well done getting to one min....try 2 next!

Retrograde
03-07-2014, 12:55 PM
Thanks Nelson and Simon.
If and when I get 1 min subs with perfect tracking then I might try going longer. :)

BruceG
03-07-2014, 04:52 PM
Very nice image Pete, I take it that's a cropped image from the 102? It's pretty small in the field of view of my Megrez 90.
I think the colours you have a just right. I don't seem to get the same sensitivity to blue that you and others have succeeded with.
Anyways, a fine result and I look forward to seeing more from you.
Cheers, Bruce.

Retrograde
03-07-2014, 06:08 PM
Thanks Bruce



Yes the image a crop of around 55% on each axis.

My ED is 714mm focal length & I have a FF but no reducer. Think the Megrez might be a bit faster f-ratio than F7? The K-5 is also a crop-sensor camera so multiply all that by 1.5. Nevertheless the Trifid was a smaller and more difficult object than I'd imagined.



When I initially stacked tifs (that I'd converted from the RAW files prior to stacking) the resulting DSS tif had less colour differentiation between the two parts of the nebula. With decent colour in the magenta section I could only get mauve in the 'blue' section.
When I stacked the RAW files (Pentax DNG format) the resulting DSS tif had better colour immediately & was much easier to post process into something acceptable. I'm still on a steep learning curve so I was probably doing it all wrong to begin with :lol: