Joshua Bunn
06-04-2014, 11:16 PM
Hello,
So im wanting to do some high resolution imaging of deep sky objects, eta Carina star etc. and eventually some planets.
Im using a PW 12.5 scope at native f8, 2.5m focal length, with a stl11000 - 9 micron pixels. The mount is a software bisque PME. I want to use a 2" Televue powermate but the question is do i go for the 2x or 4x ??
I know its going to much harder to guide at 10m FL than at 5m, but im willing to try either.
If i go the 2x powermate, and later get a planetary camera with say 3.75 micron pixels, it should work out ok (maybe still under sampled) judging by the 1st post here (http://www.iceinspace.com.au/forum/showthread.php?t=105057) by Ray. So maybe a 4x would be better for this situation??
Im also keen to give a 4x powermate a shot on deep sky objects.
What are the thoughts of others?
thanks
Josh
So im wanting to do some high resolution imaging of deep sky objects, eta Carina star etc. and eventually some planets.
Im using a PW 12.5 scope at native f8, 2.5m focal length, with a stl11000 - 9 micron pixels. The mount is a software bisque PME. I want to use a 2" Televue powermate but the question is do i go for the 2x or 4x ??
I know its going to much harder to guide at 10m FL than at 5m, but im willing to try either.
If i go the 2x powermate, and later get a planetary camera with say 3.75 micron pixels, it should work out ok (maybe still under sampled) judging by the 1st post here (http://www.iceinspace.com.au/forum/showthread.php?t=105057) by Ray. So maybe a 4x would be better for this situation??
Im also keen to give a 4x powermate a shot on deep sky objects.
What are the thoughts of others?
thanks
Josh