Log in

View Full Version here: : Sharpless 2-308


rat156
11-02-2014, 08:32 AM
Hi All,

Following on from Bert's excellent image, here's mine.

Bicolour with Ha mapped to red (2 hours), OIII mapped to blue (5.75 hours) and a composite used for the green channel. This nebula is really quite dim, some of the OIII from last night are smoke or haze affected, might get some more data if it clears tonight.

Larger version here (http://www.astrobin.com/77670/)

Cheers
Stuart

dvj
11-02-2014, 08:57 AM
Great color, detail and depth. Your ASA is working quite nicely with the 8300.

Rod771
11-02-2014, 09:05 AM
Very nicely done Stuart. :thumbsup:

Astro_Bot
11-02-2014, 09:51 AM
Nice one. :thumbsup:

(One odd thing - the star halos don't seem to be perfectly centred on the bright stars - any idea why?)

Peter Ward
11-02-2014, 10:19 AM
Stu... you are force to be reckoned with of late :)...consistently excellent images.

Thanks for posting :thumbsup::thumbsup:

DavidNg
11-02-2014, 10:37 AM
Hi Stuart,

What a beautiful image :) Love it.

Regards

alpal
11-02-2014, 11:39 AM
Hi Stuart,
Nice image.
The stars are very slightly elongated -
maybe a guiding problem?
Yes - last night had a brown haze from all the smoke.

cheers
Allan

rat156
11-02-2014, 11:57 AM
You know Al, I was looking at this this morning, I also thought this, then I blew the image up and put my reading glasses on and they looked round again. I was going to go to the optometrist to get checked out for astigmatism. I've been thinking I've been a bit astigmatic for a little while now, old tired eyes, makes it hard to judge when things are right, particularly when focusing. If they are out of round it'll be a registration problem.

Can anyone confirm that the stars are elongated up and down in the image? Preferably someone with good vision.

Cheers
Stuart

Rod771
11-02-2014, 12:39 PM
I had a look at the full rez version on Astrobin , the stars are ever so slightly enlongated vertically, more noticable in the smaller stars. But geez! I reckon that's getting really picky (on my part).

You've been pumping out some great images lately Stuart :)

cometcatcher
11-02-2014, 01:00 PM
That's a mighty fine image there Stuart. Interesting bi-colour colour mapping that works well.

alpal
11-02-2014, 01:03 PM
Maybe I was too picky -
it's too hard to tell without the RAW data so
it's not a problem.

dutch2
11-02-2014, 01:32 PM
Wow, what a sunning image.
Just gorgeous.
Well done:thumbsup::thumbsup:

RickS
11-02-2014, 01:34 PM
Very nice image, Stuart.

strongmanmike
11-02-2014, 06:39 PM
Excellent version of this object.. different to but as far as a pleasing look goes, pretty much on a par with Marco's amazing version last year, shows how the same object can be imaged and processed in two quite different ways and a fine pleasing view can still be had :) I too could see the elongated stars though..but I agree, it's not an issue and doesn't stop it being a show stopper.

MIke

rat156
11-02-2014, 06:40 PM
Maybe picky Al, but I don't mind. I've reduced the star sizes and posted a new version on Astrobin.

Cheers
Stuart

atalas
11-02-2014, 06:45 PM
Love bubbles in Space! great job Stuart.

rat156
11-02-2014, 06:50 PM
Thanks.

The reflections are not axisymmetric because they arise not on the imaging axis. I have found a couple of research papers on removing them, but none really explain why they aren't symmetrical about the star.

Someone here with more optics knowledge than I can explain it I'm sure.

Cheers
Stuart

rat156
11-02-2014, 06:52 PM
Consistently good weather helps Peter, like anything, you get better with practice.

Cheers and Thanks
Stuart

rat156
11-02-2014, 07:04 PM
Hi Mike,

Even got some star colours in there for you, they aren't correct, but hey, it's a start!. I had a look at Marco's image, it is great, I need darker skies. I'll certainly add some more imaging time to this one (one, to fix the elongated stars, two to get more detail in the nebula, but it's going to be hard to compete with Coona for dark skies.



Thanks Louie, you can take credit for at least some of this one, I've been using (and probably abusing) some of you processing techniques that you have made tutorials for, I love them, they are great.

Cheers
Stuart

alpal
11-02-2014, 07:05 PM
Looks great Stuart.
It's the kind of target you can add to over the years to build up even more data.


cheers
Allan

Logieberra
11-02-2014, 07:27 PM
Stuart, real nice! The upper right of the image - outer shell and bright star region - really draws me in. Pretty!

gregbradley
11-02-2014, 07:50 PM
Great image Stuart. Very delicate and interesting.

Greg.

ozstronomer
11-02-2014, 08:23 PM
Really nice image Stuart, lots of detail in the bubble :thumbsup:

Shiraz
13-02-2014, 10:58 AM
Gorgeous image Stuart. regards Ray

Rod771
13-02-2014, 12:16 PM
Its now image of the day on Astrobin , woo hoo!! :2thumbs:

SimmoW
13-02-2014, 01:56 PM
Bloody bewdiful!! So 3 dimensional

tilbrook@rbe.ne
13-02-2014, 05:30 PM
Top work Stuart!:thumbsup:

Really looks 3D.

Cheers,

Justin.

rat156
13-02-2014, 08:23 PM
Yeah, quite chuffed about that. I'm liking Astrobin as a place to host my images more and more, I like that you can put up larger images and I really like the plate solve. Their method of deciding the IOTD is quite democratic. No point making your own website now.

Cheers
Stuart

Rod771
13-02-2014, 08:43 PM
Yes I quite like it too. I saw your image in the banner when uploading some pics today.

Well done mate :thumbsup:

avandonk
14-02-2014, 10:47 AM
Stuart your image looks quite ethereal. The fine detail is quite apparent. The assignment of NB to colour is quite interesting as looks close to 'natural'.

I see my little F3 astrograph as an early forward scout to look for suitable targets for the BIG guns! It would be a waste of valuable imaging time to use a long slower focal length instrument to see if a dim object can be imaged.

We ALL stand on the shoulders of giants to see further except maybe Mike S.

Bert

avandonk
14-02-2014, 11:11 AM
The 'continuum haloes' are out of focus images of reflections that arise from 'non reflecting' lens surfaces and or filters that are in your image train. This is common in mirror lens assemblies.

Modern detectors are so sensitive that there is no such thing as a 'non reflecting' optical surface where lenses/filters are involved.

The reason for being non concentric is that they are a projection of the reflecting surface and it's view of the entrance aperture of your optic in relation to the bright star's off axis position.

I hope this is clear?

bert

SkyViking
14-02-2014, 12:11 PM
Wow that's one fine image of this huge bubble. Great work, the detail and processing is really impressive. And the 3D effect is obvious, nicely done!

rat156
14-02-2014, 07:50 PM
Thanks for the praise Bert, and thanks for finding stuff for us to shoot. You don't want me standing on your shoulders for too long though, might cause serious injury.

Cheers
Stuart

Ross G
15-02-2014, 08:24 AM
What a beautiful photo of an amazing looking object Stuart.

Inspiring work!

Ross.

Paul Haese
15-02-2014, 07:01 PM
A stand out image this one. Great sharp detail and nicely processed. Some more data would improve the very minor background noise and give the signal some lift but probably not really all that necessary. Well done.