Log in

View Full Version here: : Dew Shield (good materials and cheap!)


04Stefan07
25-09-2013, 12:24 PM
Title says it all!

I have been looking into making one myself the past few days.

I need to buy a hard case from Bunnings later today so I wouldn't mind buying some parts to make a Dew Shield for my 90mm MAK.

Any advice, thoughts or ideas?

Thanks!

Astro_Bot
25-09-2013, 01:34 PM
I use EVA75 foam (from Clark Rubber, but probably available at other foam places). It's excellent material - robust, matte black, light-weight, excellent insulation, holds shape well when wrapped around the end of an OTA.

I bought a whole roll and cut it myself (much cheaper in the long run), but that's becuase I figured I'd sell the dew shield with any OTA I sell, and make another one for a new OTA from the stock of foam I keep. Otherwise, Clark staff will cut what you need (for a fee). You can get an over-the-phone quote.

I've tried other materials from time to time, and EVA75 has been the clear leader so far. I have no plans to use anything else.

Astro_Bot
25-09-2013, 01:39 PM
PS: You can cut EVA75 with a big pair of scissors - in fact, that's the recommended way to do it - no need for a jig saw.

PPS: The stuff I use is 6mm thickness.

el_draco
25-09-2013, 01:56 PM
Very interesting. Do you know how this stuff responds to polyester resin?

Astro_Bot
25-09-2013, 02:07 PM
No idea, sorry. I glued velcro patches onto it with contact glue - that worked well enough.

multiweb
25-09-2013, 02:09 PM
In the past I have used flute panels. They're cheap, good insulator and easy to fold on a radius for obvious reasons. I don't like the foam/flexible stuff as it gives you an oblong aperture and that will change your star shapes.

Astro_Bot
25-09-2013, 03:42 PM
Mine stays quite round enough, and I have never noticed any distortion. EVA75 is stiffer than regular "camping roll" foam.

multiweb
25-09-2013, 03:58 PM
Fair enough. I first noticed that when star testing. I thought it was tube currents but it turned out to be the dewshield aperture doing it.

Astro_Bot
25-09-2013, 04:06 PM
YMMV. I guess it depends on the aperture, length and material used (shape deformation).

I once got weird star test results not realising that I was looking through a tree ... <facepalm> ... but never with the dew shield.

Come to think of it, light from off-axis outside the FOV shouldn't affect the image .... in fact, that's what the dew shield/light shroud is trying to prevent. Hmmm. With a longer F/L scope, especially a Mak or SCT, the retaining ring ought to still be the extreme edge of the FOV.

LewisM
25-09-2013, 04:50 PM
I have a spare dewshield from a 7.5" OTA if anyone wants it - sitting unused. Easy to modify to other OTA diameters. It is commercially made one, not homemade.

12" length, matt black textured plastic with velcro (stitched on) fastening.

LewisM
25-09-2013, 04:52 PM
PS: I made all my refractor dewshields from flexible cutting boards available in Sam's Warehouse / Crazy Clarks. $2 per cutting board. I glue on the velcro, then spray them with blackboard paint. Never failed me yet, and not ONCE had a dew up on the objective.

AG Hybrid
25-09-2013, 06:07 PM
As mentioned earlier. EVA 75 is what you want my friends :). Buy it from Clark Rubber. Comes in a good sized roll.

My 12" and 4" utilize them nicely. See the pics. Easy to work with. LIGHT and flat black. Just add Velcro with a self adhesive back. You can also use it to make dew shields and light shields for finders and telrads. :hi:
Also the only dew that builds up on them is this ultra thin film of moisture. Unlike an OTA which can feel like it was left in the rain.

04Stefan07
29-09-2013, 10:20 AM
Thanks for the advice everyone.

I might pop out to Clark Rubber when I get the chance!

04Stefan07
05-10-2013, 08:41 AM
Went to the gold old 24 hour Kmart Campbellfield last night and found one of them exercise foam mats for $4!

Will try it out when I get the chance.

Astro_Bot
05-10-2013, 12:49 PM
You may be lucky and have picked up some cheap suitable foam, but in my experience, typical exercise mat (or camping mat) foam is too soft (floppy). Still, for $4 it's worth a try. :)