Jupiter resampled 1.2X

[asimov]

My first resampling since I went the C9.25, & certainly my first since I began using registax 3 a few weeks ago. Must of crashed registax 5 times before I remembered how to do it from the 'old dayz' of the 6" refractor & ver. 2 :lol:

Anyway, I weeded out until I had 120 frames disallowing my normal 'give her heaps' in the wavelett section.

This reminds me why I went the image scale at the scope rather than using the resample option. Not overly fond of the effect. Maybe with better seeing than a 5.5-6 would help.

[Lester]

Very nice Asi,

I resampled some of mine from 23 June at 1.5 and had a few problems for a while. If the seeing is steady there is more to be gained by spreading Jupiter over more pixels, like you said magnify to the max at capture.

I like your result.

[Robert_T]

beautiful, sharp, detailed and great colour....:thumbsup:

when was this taken - new or from the archives;)

[John K]

nice image Asi, wealth of detail there, well done.

[asimov]

Thanks. No new ones since this one. (23rd)

[davidpretorius]

yes, resampling is hit and miss. It is so hard to determine which will stand up to it. Paul Haese's recent 13th June resample went really well.

Has anyone noticed major differences in 1.3, 1.4, 1.5? Not that I resample often, but I know mucking about a few months ago, I did 1.1, 1.2, 1.3 and then soon as I went 1.5, the image seemed to fall apart?

[asimov]

I used to resample @ 1.5 quite regularly on mars with the refractor, never had any problems, any bigger than that though = AARRGH!

[iceman]

That's a marvellous image Asi, one of your best. You've really come along in leaps and bounds in the last few months.

There's no doubting you're "up there" with the best now. Persistance and dedications pays off.

I've found resampling to work sometimes, but only if the raw data is very good. And I need to stack more frames to make sure the limbs don't end up all crosshatched.

[matt]

That's very nice John

The colour looks very good and there's loads of sharp detail.

Well done, mate;)

Gotta get me some more image scale at capture.

[asimov]

Thanks guys :)

I know your probably all sick to death of Jupiter images from the 23rd but heres another one, sorry! :P Once again I found an AVI hiding in a dark corner that I overlooked :D Terrible weather here at present, so all I can do is keep reprocessing old stuff :doh:

This one was VC decon. & FFT edited (as usual). No resampling.

[Lester]

Bit more contrast in this one to the first in this thread, brings out the detail nicely. Like em both, but this one is my pick.

[matt]

Nice work.

Got any info on FFT editing?

Cheers

[davidpretorius]

Asi is doing some great exploratory work here, it definately requires more investigation.

asi-einstein!

[asimov]

No info Matt. I'm still in the exploritory stages. Ones things for certain. There IS no set recipe ! Each & every image requires a different recipe. To look at the image & say "ok, this image needs this, this & this done to it" That's the secret to it.
It's called the hit or miss method. The more you do it, the more hits you will get.

[ving]

mines better :P

onya asi :)

[matt]

Interesting.

Wasn't after a "How To" but appreciate the quick explanation:thumbsup:

Was just wondering what it was since I'd seen you refer to it a few times but couldn't find any other references from other IIS-ers???

Mighty fine pioneering work there, mate.

I won't be imaging for a while by the looks of the weather.

Should have guessed it'd go pear-shaped the moment my new MoonLite electric SCT focuser arrived:mad2:

Will post another pic when it's attached to the OTA and the whole rigs a' rockin'