Frame rate shootout 3rd Aug.

[asimov]

http://solarchat.solarastronomy.org/index.php/en/this-is-solar-chat/6-this-is-solarchat-/80317-frame-rate-shootout-3rd-aug

[icytailmark]

i dunno if its my eyes but i dont see any difference. Seeing is more important.

[asimov]

And the colour version. No proms due to my above experiments.

Lunt60/DMK21/6 panes.

[Solar]

Keep coming back and looking John, one superb disc man.

[asimov]

Come out ok hey. Reckon it's close to my best so far. I could tweek more out of this one easily. Stuff it, back in for a drizzling I think.

[asimov]

Ok, about as much as I can squeeze outa this baby! It's on the verge of bleeding :rofl: :D

Had to compress the bag out of it, that might make it look a bit iffy but we'll see.

[astronobob]

Interesting work John, great captures man :thumbsup: I cropped each set into individuals and flicking between each a dozen times & I see slightly sharper & tad more black contrast in all the 120% resises; as for the frame rates, Both resized and normal, i think the 15 & 30 Fps are doing better than the 60's but cant pick between 15 & 30's :shrug:
Just thought to add another opinion for Ya, now my screen is looking washy whatever is on it ;)

[asimov]

Thanks Bob. Yes, the more opinions the better..:) As to the reasoning behind it; A few around the place reckon the slower the frame rate, the better the final image. I wanted (and a lot of others too) to see if this was true or not. I like to get in, capture the stuff, & get the hell out again so I can process & at 15 & 30 FPS there's a lot of toe tapping going on, as I have to shoot 6 AVI's & merge them to get a full disc..Give me 120 FPS! ;)

[asimov]

And I should mention that last image posted is the 60 FPS data.