Log in

View Full Version here: : Some more faint PGC's


rogerg
19-05-2006, 10:47 AM
G'day all,

Well, I didn't expect to have another image so quickly, but what do you know I have actually got some level of automation hapenning! So I was able to take 15 x 10 minutes + 5 x 10 minutes (darks) + bias + park the mount while I slept.

Hence I have a new image and am very happy that the telescope didn't break it's self while I slept :)

http://www.rogergroom.com/rogergroom/esh_rog_item.jsp?Item=284

This field is interesting yet boring at the same time. Perhaps I'm starting to analyse these things too much, but:

- PGC 96819 really looks like it's distorted, like one of those galaxies that is lensed in the hubble shots. When I enhance the image to see just the detail of this galaxy I'm sure the bottom hooks around a reasonable amount, and it has a distinct bannana shape. Who knows, I wouldn't know how to find out more info on this guy.

- PGC 993390 shows quite nice spiral structure, especially when enhanced to concentrate on him.

- The bulk of the remaining galaxies are quite featureless dots, particularly ones like PGC 96824 which is not only faint but looks like just an eliptical fuzzy blob. I wonder if this is due to the age of galaxies at Mag 19+ that most would be this kind of structure?

Anyway, enjoy.

Moving on to a new FOV hopefully Saturday night before then attempting a couple of requests people have sent through and maybe that illusive hubble south DF :D (good for a laugh perhaps).

Roger.

iceman
19-05-2006, 10:56 AM
Stunning Roger, well done! There's some faint stuff there!

I love the automation too, it would be great to be able to image while I sleep! Instead, i've gotta constantly keep babysitting my tracking.

rogerg
19-05-2006, 12:06 PM
Thanks Mike. Early days yet, I still need to sit there checking it for the first while. And I'm not sure how things will go when I start getting it to move around the sky & automatically pick an autoguiding star in a new FOV where I haven't nicely positioned one for it, etc... we'll see :)

Up until last week I had to babysit my scope 100% the time, so I know what you mean.

Roger.