#1  
Old 02-01-2015, 01:51 PM
traveller's Avatar
traveller (Bo)
Not enough time and money

traveller is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 2,133
RA not tracking after flip

Hi all,
A quick question for the more experienced AP operators. I was imaging the Horsehead a couple of nights ago. The mount was behaving and I can get 5 mins subs without any problems.
However, after I flipped the scope (from pointing east to westside) the RA was playing up badly, 30 sec is about the max I can do. Dec stayed the same.
Is this a case of the gears not setting with the worm or some other mechanical issue with the mount?
Thanks
Bo
PS: I noticed when I was packing up that the RA freeplay was very smooth and rotated at will in clockwise direction, but is not as smooth in the anticlockwise direction. Maybe these two events are linked?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-01-2015, 02:58 PM
glend (Glen)
Registered User

glend is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Lake Macquarie
Posts: 7,033
When you set the scope up did you leave some weight (ie not perfectly balanced) on the RA axis. If you make RA a little heavier on the counterweight side it will keep the gears meshed.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-01-2015, 03:12 PM
traveller's Avatar
traveller (Bo)
Not enough time and money

traveller is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 2,133
Thanks Glenn,
Yes, I left the setup bottom heavy (counterweight side) so the RA will push against the drive.
I have since adjusted the thruster bearings to the RA axis and will see if that make much difference.
Bo
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-01-2015, 05:21 PM
Peter.M's Avatar
Peter.M
Registered User

Peter.M is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 947
If you make the counterweight side heavy, then the worm will be pressed up against the ring gear on one side of the mount and on the other side it will be moving away from the ring gear.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-01-2015, 06:13 PM
traveller's Avatar
traveller (Bo)
Not enough time and money

traveller is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 2,133
Thanks Peter,
I have adjusted the thruster bearings a bit on the RA axis and will see how it goes. I had to back off the pressure of the thruster bearings on the DEC axis and that made a difference.
Bo
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-01-2015, 08:02 PM
LewisM's Avatar
LewisM
Novichok test rabbit

LewisM is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Somewhere in the cosmos...
Posts: 10,388
Scope east, counterweight least
Scope west, counterweight best

In otherwords, when the scope is on the east side of RA, let the scope side be slightly heavier (slide counterweight up a centimeter or so). When the scope is on the west side, make the counterweight side the heavier side (slide them down a little)

I had a small 500 gram stainless weight made just for this purpose. I set it so that perfect balance allows it a +/- 5 cm range. Seems to work fine.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-01-2015, 09:26 AM
traveller's Avatar
traveller (Bo)
Not enough time and money

traveller is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 2,133
Thanks Lewis,
Is this for the northern hemisphere or southern? I THOUHGT I made the setup bottom heavy when pointing East, but it would appear that I had the setup top heavy pointing East, and therefore should have eased the counterweights down a notch when pointing west.
Bo
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-01-2015, 10:06 AM
mill's Avatar
mill (Martin)
sword collector

mill is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Mount Evelyn
Posts: 2,922
Bo Lewis means when the scope is east then the counterweights point west so the scope side should be heavier and vice versa.
So weights East, lower weights, weights West, put the counter weight up.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-01-2015, 02:07 PM
traveller's Avatar
traveller (Bo)
Not enough time and money

traveller is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 2,133
Yes Martin, that's how I had my setup.
I was imaging the horsehead in the early evening, so the scope was on the eastern side and the weights were pointed to the west. That was when I was able to get 5 mins of guided exposures.
Then I flipped the setup so the scope was pointed west and weights pointed east and that's when I was only able to get 30 sec exposure.
Bo
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-01-2015, 02:47 PM
LewisM's Avatar
LewisM
Novichok test rabbit

LewisM is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Somewhere in the cosmos...
Posts: 10,388
But after the flip did you remember to alter the weight position to lower down the bar?
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 03-01-2015, 04:22 PM
alocky's Avatar
alocky (Andrew lockwood)
PI popular people's front

alocky is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: perth australia
Posts: 1,291
Did you flip the calibration on the autoguider or recalibrate it after the meridian flip?
Cheers,
Andrew
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 04-01-2015, 08:42 AM
traveller's Avatar
traveller (Bo)
Not enough time and money

traveller is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 2,133
Quote:
Originally Posted by LewisM View Post
But after the flip did you remember to alter the weight position to lower down the bar?
No, I didn't adjust the weights, so that needs to be done next time to see if it makes any difference.

Quote:
Originally Posted by alocky View Post
Did you flip the calibration on the autoguider or recalibrate it after the meridian flip?
Cheers,
Andrew
Didn't do that either, looks like that's another thing to keep in mind.
Thanks again all.
Bo
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 03:43 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Testar
Advertisement